from Robert Reich
This is no April Fools joke. Today, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court in McCutcheon vs. Federal Election Commission, went beyond Citizens United to strike down overall limits on how much an individual may contribute in one election cycle to innumerable federal candidates and to party committees. Overturning 40 years of national policy and 38 years of judicial precedent, the Courts decision allows federal officeholders to solicit and individual donors to pour as much as $3.6 million directly into federal campaigns every election cycle buying unparalleled personal influence in Washington and drowning out the voices of ordinary citizens. (It gives me no satisfaction that I testified against John Roberts at his confirmation hearing years ago.) This is the most brazen invitation to oligarchy in Supreme Court history.
In my view, we must amend the Constitution to establish once and for all that (1) money is not speech under the First Amendment, (2) corporations are not people, and (3) we the people have the right to set limits on how much money individuals and corporations can spend on elections. You with me?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)numbers to get people in office that will vote for a constitutional amendment.
Nay
(12,051 posts)be needed to get an amendment to the Constitution are the ones who have been bought out by the money.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)this topic front and center.
K&
elleng
(131,144 posts)it takes much more than one person to keep this topic front and center.
The process: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution/
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I hope they work together, and I imagine they will, on some level. It is encouraging to hear
Reich talk about entering the race to make the promise to hold off the train wreck that comes
via money/ policies from Wall Street.
No doubt, not an easy feat, but we have to try. Reich often gets MSM attention, they don't
consider him a crazy liberal..so I hope to see him discuss this where he can be heard more
clearly and by millions more people.
Great OP, elleng.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...without the help of the "Centrist" Democrats.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)They moved the ball and broke the gridlock.
Thanks A BUNCH.
That is the problem I have with "Moderates" and "Centrists",
they agree with Republicans too damned much.
radiclib
(1,811 posts)to amend. Reich is correct, and we cannot vote the problem away. Only by bringing pressure to bear on our state reps can this be done, because in most cases, they haven't experienced the need to be completely corrupted yet.
State by state. We've got Vermont, we need 33 more.
http://www.wolf-pac.com