from Robert Reich
If wealth and income werent already so concentrated in the hands of a few, yesterdays shameful McCutcheon decision by the five Republican appointees to the Supreme Court wouldnt be nearly as dangerous. But unlimited political donations coupled with widening inequality create a vicious cycle in which the wealthy buy votes that lower their taxes, give them bailouts and subsidies, and deregulate their businesses thereby making them even wealthier and capable of buying even more votes. Corruption breeds more corruption.
The closest parallel to today came in the late 19th century, when the lackeys of robber barons were literally depositing sacks of money on the desks of pliant legislators. The great jurist Louis Brandeis (below) noted that the nation had a choice: We can have a democracy or we can have great wealth in the hands of a few, he said. But we cannot have both. Soon thereafter America reached a tipping point. Public outrage gave birth to the progressive era, in which the nations first campaign finance laws were enacted, trusts were broken up, a progressive income tax was instituted, regulations barred impure food and drugs, and the first labor laws put into effect in several states.
When do we reach another tipping point? And what happens then?
yurbud
(39,405 posts)fundamental problems like this.
Simply electing Democrats and hoping that they will do the right thing clearly won't work since it hasn't so far.
Too many Democratic politicians are either owned or afraid of the very wealthy to do anything.