Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 08:27 AM Apr 2014

Cutting off our nose to spite our face on nuclear security cooperation with Russia

http://www.nukesofhazardblog.com/story/2014/4/10/135719/033

Cutting off our nose to spite our face on nuclear security cooperation with Russia
Kingston Reif - Apr 10, 2014

Russia's illegal invasion of Crimea requires a strong and forceful US response to support Ukraine and punish Moscow. But that fact that a meaningful response is required does not mean that we should deliberately score an own goal by taking actions that would be self-evidently counterproductive and detrimental to our security.

As former Secretary of State George Schultz and former Senator Sam Nunn wrote in a recent Washington Post op-ed, "A key to ending the Cold War was the Reagan administration’s rejection of the concept of linkage, which said that bad behavior by Moscow in one sphere had to lead to a freeze of cooperation in all spheres." "Although current circumstances make it difficult," they noted, "we should not lose sight of areas of common interest where cooperation remains crucial to the security of Russia, Europe and the United States. This includes securing nuclear materials...and preventing catastrophic terrorism, as well as destroying Syrian chemical stockpiles and preventing nuclear proliferation by Iran and others."

This is wise advice. But wisdom is a commodity in short supply on the GOP-led House Armed Services Committee, especially when it comes to nuclear policy. It should not be surprising, then, that the Republican leadership of the Committee is sponsoring legislation in response to the Crimea crisis that would imperil our security by stopping nuclear security cooperation with Russia.

Among the many not so brilliant ideas included in the legislation, which is titled “Forging Peace through Strength in Ukraine and the Transatlantic Alliance” and co-sponsored by Reps. Michael Turner, Buck McKeon, and Mike Rogers, is a provision that "Prohibits the contact, cooperation or transfer of technology between the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Energy certifies the Russian military is no longer illegally occupying Crimea, no longer violating the INF treaty, and in compliance with the CFE treaty."

<snip>


1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cutting off our nose to spite our face on nuclear security cooperation with Russia (Original Post) bananas Apr 2014 OP
Yes, we must punish Russia JayhawkSD Apr 2014 #1
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
1. Yes, we must punish Russia
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 11:07 AM
Apr 2014

That invasion with guns blazing, bombs dropping and rockets firing, that killed thousands of iunnocent civilians and allowed them to militarily occupy a country that did not want them to be there and that is to this day fighting tooth and nail to throw them back out, definitely requires that we punish them for doing something that we would never in a million years even think about doing.

Absolutely. I am with you. Sanctions are not enough. I think we should reinvade and take Ukraine back from them and occupy it ourselves, so that the freedom loving people of Ukraine can enjoy democracy just like the people of Libya, Iran and Afghanistan do. The fact that they will be dying in large numbers from the corrupt governments that we install will not matter, because they will be democracies.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Cutting off our nose to s...