Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 02:25 PM Apr 2014

‘Smart’ Firearm Draws Wrath of the Gun Lobby

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — Belinda Padilla does not pick up unknown calls anymore, not since someone posted her cellphone number on an online forum for gun enthusiasts. A few fuming-mad voice mail messages and heavy breathers were all it took.

Then someone snapped pictures of the address where she has a P.O. box and put those online, too. In a crude, cartoonish scrawl, this person drew an arrow to the blurred image of a woman passing through the photo frame. “Belinda?” the person wrote. “Is that you?”

Her offense? Trying to market and sell a new .22-caliber handgun that uses a radio frequency-enabled stopwatch to identify the authorized user so no one else can fire it. Ms. Padilla and the manufacturer she works for, Armatix, intended to make the weapon the first “smart gun” for sale in the United States.

But shortly after Armatix went public with its plans to start selling in Southern California, Ms. Padilla, a fast-talking, hard-charging Beverly Hills businesswoman who leads the company’s fledgling American division, encountered the same uproar that has stopped gun control advocates, Congress, President Obama and lawmakers across the country as they seek to pass tougher laws and promote new technologies they contend will lead to fewer firearms deaths.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/us/politics/smart-firearm-draws-wrath-of-the-gun-lobby.html?hpw&rref=us&_r=0
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. Just think how many lives something like that would save. But NRA, and likes of Zimmerman, Dunn,
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 02:31 PM
Apr 2014

and millions of gun toting yahoos, are fearful this safety feature might keep some innocent kid from getting killed.

mikeysnot

(4,757 posts)
4. The gun nuts are afraid of ANY gun laws.
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 02:41 PM
Apr 2014

and have been conditioned to react negatively to any successful gun laws like Chicago's.

 

Mr_Rogers

(43 posts)
11. It is the classic example for the pro-gun crowd as to why gun prohibition doesn't work...
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 10:12 AM
Apr 2014

... mostly due to the fact that only the criminal portion of society had access to firearms and that led to a very high murder rate.

There are arguments against it as well but I was interested in what you thought since their murder rate is so high and the point isn't immediately obvious.

mikeysnot

(4,757 posts)
12. gun Prohibition doesn't work
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 10:47 AM
Apr 2014

because it has never been done on a federal level. The criminal "law abiding" elements in the gun proliferation crowd and the gun manufacturers make sure the streets are flooded with cheap easily accessible guns.

Our laws were simple, no hand guns in the city limits, it worked for 25 years. The lame argument that the laws didn't work because we had gun deaths is moot. By the gun proliferation own point that no gun laws or concealed carry laws work to stop crimes proves this.

take the three instances in Georgia...

This fucking "moran"..

http://aattp.org/gun-nut-causes-panic-at-little-league-game-look-i-got-a-gun-and-theres-nothing-you-can-do-about-it-video/

And this fucking asshole coward

http://aattp.org/gunman-dead-at-least-6-wounded-in-shooting-at-fed-ex-facility-in-georgia/

More assholes in TX....

http://aattp.org/open-carry-texas-terrorizes-concerned-911-callers-threatens-to-release-their-private-info-video/

If guns kept us safe we would be the safest country in the world. We are not. We have the most guns in private citizens hands and the most gun deaths. Do the math.

The gun manufacturers are laughing all the way to the bank on idiots phobias.

3catwoman3

(24,006 posts)
7. "It has the word 'smart' in it."
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 03:36 PM
Apr 2014

Excellent point!

Maybe the inventor should try to market her idea as an "anti-liberal lock" - "If the damn libruls come for your gunz, it won't do them any good because ONLY YOU can fire your weapon." People lie in advertising and marketing all the time.

It would be embraced with alacrity and enthusiasm.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»‘Smart’ Firearm Draws Wra...