Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sun May 4, 2014, 07:32 PM May 2014

The Decline Of Deterrence; America Is No Longer As Alarming To Its Foes Or Reassuring To Its Friends

May 3rd 2014 | BRUSSELS, CAIRO, SINGAPORE AND WASHINGTON, DC



AMERICA’S allies are nervous. With Russia grabbing territory, China bullying its neighbours and Syria murdering its people, many are asking: where is Globocop? Under what circumstances will America act to deter troublemakers? What, ultimately, would America fight for?

The answer to this question matters. Rogue states will behave more roguishly if they doubt America’s will to stop them. As a former head of Saudi intelligence recently said of Vladimir Putin’s land grab in Ukraine: “While the wolf is eating the sheep, there is no shepherd to come to the rescue.” Small wonder that Barack Obama was asked, at every stop during his just-completed four-country swing through Asia, how exactly he plans to wield American power. How would the president respond if China sought to expand its maritime borders by force? How might he curb North Korea’s nuclear provocations? At every press conference he was also quizzed about Ukraine, for world news follows an American president everywhere.

When it came to formal pledges of reassurance, Mr Obama did not stint. In Tokyo he offered fresh guarantees that the defence treaty between Japan and America covers all Japanese-administered territory, including the Senkaku islands, which China also claims. While visiting some of the 28,000 American troops stationed in South Korea, he vowed that his government would not hesitate to use “military might to defend our allies”. In the Philippines Mr Obama signed a new, ten-year agreement to give American forces greater access to local bases.

While Mr Obama was in Asia on April 28th American officials unveiled new sanctions against Russia: visa bans and asset freezes for Putin cronies such as Igor Sechin, the boss of Rosneft, a big state oil firm. On the same day a final detachment of American paratroopers arrived in Estonia, bringing to about 600 the number of American soldiers now on exercises in Poland and the three Baltic countries (all of which fear Russia). Whereas Russia tried to mask its deeds in Ukraine by deploying troops with no insignia, the whole point of America’s action was to show off the Stars and Stripes on the uniforms.

MORE...

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21601538-america-no-longer-alarming-its-foes-or-reassuring-its-friends-decline

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Decline Of Deterrence; America Is No Longer As Alarming To Its Foes Or Reassuring To Its Friends (Original Post) Purveyor May 2014 OP
But it more than makes up for it pscot May 2014 #1
Well said. Louisiana1976 May 2014 #3
As long as Russia and the US have nuclear weapons Gman May 2014 #2
What a load of crap. cheapdate May 2014 #4
+1. nt bemildred May 2014 #5
+1 Blue_Tires May 2014 #6

Gman

(24,780 posts)
2. As long as Russia and the US have nuclear weapons
Sun May 4, 2014, 07:51 PM
May 2014

The Balance Of Terror continues to exist through mutually assured destruction. For decades we 'be wanted to abolish nuclear weapons and we've made progress toward that goal. But In an international system characterized by anarchy, and where the (perceived or otherwise) irrational player has power (e.g. Putin now) this is the kind of changing international landscape we will continue to see. Right, wrong or indifferent, this is the issue PNAC intended to address. They wanted to do it through force and establishing American hegemony their way. But that hadn't worked out real well for them and the world.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
4. What a load of crap.
Sun May 4, 2014, 11:08 PM
May 2014

According to The Economist, not going to war in Syria damaged American "credibility" and ending the war in Iraq has created a "perception of American timidity".

Neocons and warmongers loathe this president, and he don't care.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Decline Of Deterrence...