Editorials & Other Articles

Bill USA

(6,436 posts) Tue May 6, 2014, 06:38 PM May 2014

Media Omit Crucial Detail In Reporting On Retired General's Benghazi Testimony

http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/05/01/media-omit-crucial-detail-in-reporting-on-retir/199134

Media Ignore Lovell's Crucial Clarification, Seize On "We Should Have Tried" Comment

Lovell Says "We Should Have Tried" To Rescue Victims, Clarifies He Did Not Mean The Response Was Insufficient. On May 1, Lovell, who served as deputy intelligence director at the U.S. Africa Command in Germany (AFRICOM) during the September 11, 2012 attack, testified that "we should have tried" to rescue the victims of the attack. Later, Lovell clarified his remark in an exchange with Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA):

[div class="excerpt" style="border: 1px solid #000000;" ]CONNOLLY: I want to read to you the conclusion of the chairman of the [Armed Services] Committee, the Republican chairman Buck McKeon, who conducted formal briefings and oversaw that report. He said, quote, "I'm pretty well satisfied that given where the troops were, how quickly the thing all happened, and how quickly it dissipated we probably couldn't have done much more than we did." Do you take issue with the Chairman of the Armed Services Committee? In that conclusion?

LOVELL: His conclusion that he couldn't have done much more than they did with the capability and the way they executed it?

CONNOLLY: Given the timeframe.

LOVELL: That's a fact.

CONNOLLY: OK.

LOVELL: The way it is right now. The way he stated it.

CONNOLLY: All right, because I'm sure you can appreciate, general, there might be some who, for various and sundry reasons would like to distort your testimony and suggest that you're testifying that we could have, should have done a lot more than we did because we had capabilities we simply didn't utilize. That is not your testimony?

LOVELL: That is not my testimony.

CONNOLLY: I thank you very much. [Media Matters, 5/1/14]

ABC News' Sawyer: Lovell "Testified Before Congress That The U.S. Military Should Have Tried To Do More To Fend Off That Attack." In a May 1 report on Lovell's Benghazi testimony, ABC World News host Diane Sawyer said Lovell "testified before Congress that the U.S. military should have tried to do more to fend off that attack." The segment never mentioned that Lovell later clarified the remark and agreed that the military could not have done more. [ABC, ABC World News, 5/1/14]

NBC News: "Official: 'We Should Have Tried' to Help During Benghazi Attack." NBCNews.com published a report on Lovell's testimony under the headline, "Official: 'We Should Have Tried' to Help During Benghazi Attack." The report omitted Lovell's clarification with Rep. Connolly in which he explained that it was "a fact" that there was nothing more the military could have done. [NBCNews.com, 5/1/14]

Fox's Perino: Lovell "Said That Our Military Should Have At Least Tried" To Save Benghazi Victims. On the May 1 edition of Fox News' The Five, co-host Dana Perino claimed that during testimony of the military's response to Benghazi, Lovell "said that our military should have at least tried, but it was never even ordered." The rest of the show made no mention of Lovell's later clarification of those remarks. [Fox News, The Five, 5/1/14]
(more)