White supremacy and slavery: Gerald Horne on the real story of American independence
My mind is fairly blown. Read the whole interview. http://www.salon.com/2014/05/30/white_supremacy_and_slavery_gerald_horne_on_the_real_story_of_american_independence/
It's time to revisit America's heroic creation myth and what really happened in 1776, author-historian tells Salon
With a sweeping and widely praised new essay on reparations in the Atlantic, Ta-Nehisi Coates has challenged Americans to reconsider how they view their countrys history and to place the influence of white supremacy front and center. Rather than imagine the damages inflicted against African-Americans by white supremacy as having occurred mainly during the antebellum period, Coates asks us to recognize how Jim Crow in the South and redlining in the North denied black people the means to build real, stable lives for themselves, directly explaining the disproportionate poverty we still see in the African-American community today.
Yet as penetrating as Coates essay may be, a new book from University of Houston professor Gerald Horne would have our revision of our own history stretch back even further to the very founding itself. In The Counter-Revolution of 1776: Slave Resistance and the Origins of the United States of America, Horne marshals considerable research to paint a picture of a U.S. that wasnt founded on liberty, with slavery as an uncomfortable and aberrant remnant of a pre-Enlightenment past, but rather was founded on slavery as a defense of slavery with the language of liberty and equality used as window dressing. If hes right, in other words, then the traditional narrative of the creation of the U.S. is almost completely wrong.
Salon recently spoke with Horne about his book, why the conventional story of the U.S. founding has been so widely accepted, and what this new view of the American Revolution might mean for those still fighting white supremacy today. Our conversation is below and has been lightly edited for clarity and length.
Judi Lynn
(160,530 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)vlakitti
(401 posts)I hope it gets a hearing, though important things like this usually don't.
Read the Salon interview. It's important.
newthinking
(3,982 posts)thucythucy
(8,050 posts)"How is it that the loudest yelps for liberty come from the drivers of slaves?"
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)And yes, I read the article, and have heard this story before. But it is, sadly, nothing more than a form of extremist revisionism.
For one thing, he does not, at all, take into account how many of the Brits *really* viewed blacks in America.....nothing more than chess pieces to manipulate; pawns to do their bidding(yes, it's true that the Patriots were *also* guilty of this to a degree. Nor is he accurate on abolitionism in Britain; it didn't begin to really take off until after the Revolution had succeeded. And the idea that the U.S. was founded as a defense of slavery.....well, it's just outright ludicrous on face value alone. Honestly, I'm liable to think Dr. Horne, either has some sort of axe to grind, or he's just another one of those fringe-left weirdos trying to gain fame by being as totally controversial as possible(just as crazies on the far-right do).....or hell, maybe both.
Either way, this nuttiness just isn't worth the time of anybody with a basic understanding of American history, especially not a self-respecting liberal worth his salt, regardless of their gender, national origin, etc.
Uncle Joe
(58,361 posts)Thanks for the thread, uhnope.