The Operators: Six Questions for Michael Hastings by Scott Horton
Harper's Magazine.
Michael Hastingss Polk Awardwinning Rolling Stone article, The Runaway General, brought the career of General Stanley McChrystal, Americas commander in Afghanistan, to an abrupt end. Now Hastings has developed the material from that article, and the storm that broke in its wake, into an equally explosive book, The Operators, which includes a merciless examination of relations between major media and the American military establishment. I put six questions to Hastings about his book and his experiences as a war correspondent in Iraq and Afghanistan:
1. Your book presents a Barack Obama who behaves uncomfortably and perhaps too deferentially around his generals, but who is also the first president since Harry S. Truman to have sacked a theater commander during wartimeand moreover, who did it twice (first, General David McKiernan, then McChrystal). How do you reconcile these observations?
I actually think the two observations reveal an evolution in the presidents relationship to the military. During my reporting, one of the conclusions I came to was that President Obamas mistake wasnt firing General McChrystalit was hiring him in the first place. General McKiernan wouldnt have been a political headache for the president; McKiernan wouldnt have waged a media campaign to undermine the White House, nor have demanded 130,000 troops.
The president didnt come up with the idea to fire McKiernan on his own. He was convinced to do so by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Admiral David Mullen, and General David Petraeus. He took their advice without questioning it, really. That, I believe, was his original sin in dealing with the military. The rap on McKiernan was that he was a loser who just didnt get it. I never bought that narrativenor did a number of military officials I spoke to. McKiernan understood perfectly well what counterinsurgency was, and hed started enacting it. (There were fewer civilian deaths under McKiernan than McChrystal.) But McKiernan was on the wrong teamhe was the victim, essentially, of bureaucratic infighting. At the time, the president had put a lot of trust in Gates and Mullen (misplaced, in my opinion) and didnt have the confidence to say, Hey, wait a second, maybe McKiernan should stay.
remainder: http://www.harpers.org/archive/2012/01/hbc-90008406