Meat Is Murder—but It’s People Being Killed (and Not How You Think)
23,000 Americans will die this year from antibiotic-resistant infections; 80 percent of antibiotics in the U.S. are used by the meat industry. Can Big Ag and Big Pharma change in time to save this critical medicine for humans?June 06, 2014 By Richard Conniff
One evening in June 2011, at their home in a suburb of Portland, Ore., Melissa Lee and her husband sat down to a dinner of spaghetti and meatballs with their 10-month-old daughter. It was one of the first times Ruby Lee ever tasted meat. What followed, over the next few days, was a new parents nightmare of fever, diarrhea, listlessness, and doctorsculminating in an urgent phone call about blood test results: Get Ruby to the hospital now. Rubys bloodstream was infected with a virulent bacterial strain, Salmonella heidelberg, from the ground turkey she had eaten. She was one of 136 victims in that outbreak and among the 47.8 million cases, including 3,037 deaths, of food-borne illnesses in the United States that year. Medical detective work and DNA fingerprinting soon traced the outbreak back to Cargill, the privately owned agribusiness giant based in the Midwest, which had to recall more than 35 million pounds of ground turkey.
Ruby spent seven days in the hospital on an intravenous drip line. (The needle had to be moved from hand to foot to arm because her tiny body kept rejecting it.) Then she spent four days at home with an antibiotic line threaded into her heart. The bacteria strain that she got, we didnt find out till later, was antibiotic resistant, Melissa Lee recalled not long ago. So the fact that the antibiotic they gave her actually worked was a minor miracle. Four other commonly prescribed antibiotics would have failed. It was sheer luck that they gave her the right one.
snip
From the start, researchers knew that chronic exposure to antibiotics would inevitably cause bacteria to become resistant. But the meat industry has argued that this resistance remains confined to animals and does not spill over to affect human health; the most it seems it will concede is Cargills statement on its website that it is an ongoing debate about whether animal antibiotic use can adversely affect human health. Proponents of continued livestock use also point out that antibiotics have made it possible to keep animals healthy in large-scale production facilitiesenabling industry to provide cheap meat in abundance for American dinner tables. Routine use of antibiotics, and the resulting lower cost of meat, has been a significant factor in the doubling of meat consumption in this country, from just over 90 pounds per person in 1940 to 184 in the peak year of 2004. (Incidence of heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and certain cancers has spiked over the same period; medical science links all of these conditions to excessive meat consumption, which has put enormous pressure on the health care system entirely apart from the effects of antibiotic resistance itself.)
But scientific evidence about the public health risks of antibiotic use in meat production is becoming increasingly precise. That now pits much of the health care community and a broad coalition of political, social, and retail organizations against the giants that dominate the meat businessamong them Cargill, Tyson Foods, ConAgra, Perdue Farms, Smithfield Foods (acquired by the Chinese firm Shuanghui International in fall 2013), and JBS S.A. (the Brazilian firm that acquired Swift + Company in 2007). Those companies account for the lions share of the 90-billion-plus pounds of red meat and poultry produced in the U.S. each year. Executives at these companies sometimes acknowledge the need to move away from some antibiotic uses, if only because of changing consumer attitudes on the issue. But antibiotics have made it possible to grow more animals faster and in more crowded conditionsthe central premise of the highly concentrated modern livestock industryso the prospect of reducing their use has little appeal. Moreover, demands for changes that could eat into the meat industrys bottom line come as it faces sharply increased feed costs and annual meat consumption thats down 18 pounds per capita since 2004. (Accounting varies, but meat producers still manage to rake in well over $100 billion a year.)
http://www.takepart.com/feature/2014/06/06/antibiotic-resistance-from-meat?cmpid=tpnews-eml-2014-06-07-smartkids
Warpy
(111,255 posts)is so that if it does make me sick, it won't be with a resistant bug.
I also tend to overcook it a bit. I use a meat thermometer and I want all the bugs dead, thanks.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)I no longer eat meat but it affects all of us whether we eat meat or not. The meat industry is not being regulated in its use of antibiotics.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Yes, ethical. Because a farmer who uses antibiotics for growth is unethical. Know your farmer. Go in with your family and neighbors on buying a whole cow or pig straight from the farm. You'll have a much better quality product and you will save money, guaranteed. I regard anything, including food, made by a corporation to be suspect. They do not care about quality or safety.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:19 PM - Edit history (1)
I know several people who do that - most of them grew up in a farming area and have some kind of connection to a farmer or farm community.
But I suspect that many people in urban or suburban areas would have no idea how to go about buying directly from a farmer, or how to process and store a large amount of meat.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I've also lived in Manhattan. Less than an hour and you're at a farm. It is worth the little extra effort because we save so much money for very high quality meat. I was a vegetarian for many years because of so many issues about the way animals are mistreated and the horrible things that are done for market. But my health deteriorated so badly, I started eating meat again and got better. But I made it a point to find ethical, humane meat. I go in with a neighbor, two friends and another family. There are also co-ops and groups. It also is a great way to build community and participate in one's health to make quality food a top priority. Kids especially love gardening and it is a good activity.
I watched this TED talk about urban gardening and just thought it was such a good idea. When so many talk about urban food deserts, people are trying to come up with solutions. But the main thing is knowing how much what you eat is directly correlated to your health and making gathering and cooking a top priority. Before the industrial age, that was the activity that took the most time for people. I know neighbors who do meal swaps and share produce. If we help each other, it can be done.
http://www.ted.com/talks/ron_finley_a_guerilla_gardener_in_south_central_la
undeterred
(34,658 posts)I hope many more people will do the same.