Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:40 PM Jan 2012

The Obama Memos

Very long but fascinating article, difficult to clip. If you have time, this might interest you.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/01/30/120130fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=all

The Obama Memos
The making of a post-post-partisan Presidency.
by Ryan Lizza January 30, 2012

Hundreds of pages of internal White House memos show Obama grappling with the unpleasant choices of government.

snip//

Each night, an Obama aide hands the President a binder of documents to review. After his wife goes to bed, at around ten, Obama works in his study, the Treaty Room, on the second floor of the White House residence. President Bush preferred oral briefings; Obama likes his advice in writing. He marks up the decision memos and briefing materials with notes and questions in his neat cursive handwriting. In the morning, each document is returned to his staff secretary. She dates and stamps it—“Back from the OVAL”—and often e-mails an index of the President’s handwritten notes to the relevant senior staff and their assistants. A single Presidential comment might change a legislative strategy, kill the proposal of a well-meaning adviser, or initiate a bureaucratic process to answer a Presidential question.

If the document is a decision memo, its author usually includes options for Obama to check at the end. The formatting is simple, but the decisions are not. As Obama told the Times, early in his first term, Presidents are rarely called on to make the easy choices. “Somebody noted to me that by the time something reaches my desk, that means it’s really hard,” he said. “Because if it were easy, somebody else would have made the decision and somebody else would have solved it.”

snip//

He also could be ruthless toward members of his party in Congress. When he was informed in a memo that Representative Jim Oberstar, a Minnesota Democrat, wanted to write a highway bill that included a hundred and fifteen billion dollars more in spending than Obama had proposed, and which would be funded by a gas-tax increase, Obama wrote “No,” and underlined it. When he was informed that the Census Bureau had spent six hundred million dollars over two years in a failed attempt to use handheld computers for the census, “and is reverting to paper-based data collection,” he wrote, “This is appalling.” Obama was eager to get credit as a penny-pincher. When his aides submitted a detailed plan to improve government performance and reduce waste, he wrote back, “This is good stuff—we need to constantly publicize our successful efforts here.”

snip//

Obama made important mistakes in the first half of his term. He underestimated the severity of the recession and therefore the scale of the response it required, and he clung too long to his vision of post-partisanship, even in the face of a radicalized opposition whose stated goal was his defeat. The memos show a cautious President, someone concerned with his image. When, in 2009, he was presented with the windfall pot of thirty-five billion dollars that he could spend on one of his campaign priorities or use for deficit reduction, Obama wrote, “I would opt for deficit reduction, but it doesn’t sound like we would get any credit for it.” At other moments, the memos show a President intensely focused on trying to restrain the government Leviathan he inherited, despite an opposition that doesn’t trust his intentions. When his aides submit a plan to save money on administrative efficiencies, Obama writes back, with some resignation, “This is good—but we should be careful not to overhype this given D.C. cynicism.” He is frustrated with the irrational side of Washington, but he also leans on the wisdom of his political advisers when they make a strong case that a good policy is bad politics. The private Obama is close to what many people suspect: a President trying to pass his agenda while remaining popular enough to win reëlection.

Obama didn’t remake Washington. But his first two years stand as one of the most successful legislative periods in modern history. Among other achievements, he has saved the economy from depression, passed universal health care, and reformed Wall Street. Along the way, Obama may have changed his mind about his 2008 critique of Hillary Clinton. “Working the system, not changing it” and being “consumed with beating” Republicans “rather than unifying the country and building consensus to get things done” do not seem like such bad strategies for success after all. ?


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
1. I came to post this. I found this a serious and balanced article.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 08:01 PM
Jan 2012

Very well written and a fascinating glimpse at Obama's decision making process.

noel711

(2,185 posts)
2. None of this is surprising...
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 08:08 PM
Jan 2012

but why isn't his meticulous methodology and success broadcast
all over the news?

All we hear, over and over again, is the blowhard bloviators blasting:
"Obama is a failure in leadership, and hasn't done anything to help America."

That's all the news low information voters need to hear: He does nothing.

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
3. I SO agree with you! We hear all the negatives from the talking heads
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 08:57 PM
Jan 2012

as expressed by the opposition; why aren't they, the talking heads, informing?

As for low info voters, I've always thought they must be 'willfully' ignorant to believe whomever they're listening to without any actual facts presented. Yet they spread those 'facts'.

Mopar151

(9,983 posts)
5. The "Low Info Voters" are proud to be willfully ignorant
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 04:00 PM
Jan 2012

They ignore facts which go against whatever ideology they've taken for their own this week. Narrative and a good "gotcha" line mean FAR more to them then proven, verifiable fact. To many, a fact that is in conflict with their ideology "has to" be a lie from the "liberal" media. In their world, feelings are better than facts, emotion is superior to logic.

And worse, they are ripe for brainwashing by Roger Ailes at Fox, who is himself invested in pandering to his own fears and phobias. His cadre of bodyguards and armored windows (in his 2nd floor office) to keep "the gays" he fears out, and protect him from "Al-Quieda"

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
4. I thought I was long-winded. Wow, this article is too long and too lacking in new facts to bother
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jan 2012

to read.

My question is: How did the author get these "internal memos"?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Obama Memos