Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 09:46 AM Jun 2014

Who Doesn’t Want to Close the E-Mail Privacy Loophole?

By Josh Eidelson
June 20, 2014

Right now, law enforcement officials who want to access private e-mails more than 180 days old can do it legally without any oversight requirement, like obtaining a warrant. That’s because of a loophole in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, a bill that passed years before the invention of the World Wide Web and failed to anticipate the dramatic transformation in how people use technology to send messages to one another.

For years one of the ECPA’s co-authors, Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, has been trying to amend the law. His bill passed the Judiciary Committee in November 2012 and again in April 2013, but it hasn’t received a Senate floor vote. Now the best chance to advance the issue could come from the gridlocked House, where the ongoing national debate about privacy is scrambling standard partisan divisions.

Earlier this week, Republican Kevin Yoder of Kansas and Democrat Jared Polis of Colorado said their Email Privacy Act has crossed a key threshold, adding its 218th co-sponsor—enough to give the bill a majority if it’s brought to a vote on the House floor. “Ensuring e-mails are covered under the Fourth Amendment and protected from warrantless searches,” Yoder said in a statement, “is a common-sense issue that unites both parties.”

The Yoder-Polis bill would restrict the release of customers’ information by Internet providers and generally require police to obtain warrants before gaining access to private e-mails—just as they must before intercepting physical pieces of mail. The prospect of telecommunications providers forking over extensive consumer information isn’t merely speculative: Details released by seven carriers revealed they’d answered more than a million law enforcement requests for customer records, including text messages ...


http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-06-20/bipartisan-push-to-close-e-mail-privacy-loophole

The bill "Email Privacy Act " is HR1852: it was referred to Judiciary in early May and to the Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations subcommittee last week. Thomas currently lists 220 cosponsors

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who Doesn’t Want to Close the E-Mail Privacy Loophole? (Original Post) struggle4progress Jun 2014 OP
Uh oh... Stryst Jun 2014 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Who Doesn’t Want to Close...