Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,889 posts)
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 11:30 AM Jun 2014

from Robert Reich

Some wealthy financiers (billionaire Tom Steyer, former New York Mayor Michael Bloomber, and former Treasury Secretary and Goldman-Sachs CEO Henry Paulson Jr.) are pushing a carbon tax. Well and good. But putting a price on carbon could make electricity more expensive – imposing a huge burden on the poor and middle class in an era of declining real wages and widening inequality. Yesterday President Obama acknowledged this, warning environmentalists they must "shape our strategies to address the very real and legitimate concerns of working families.” But neither the wealthy financiers nor the President is proposing a solution. Here’s one: The money polluters pay goes into a big fund that’s then divided up and sent to every American, with the amount of "refund" inversely related to income. So, for example, a low income family whose electricity bill goes up $20 a month gets back $40. It's a win-win -- helping reduce climate change and at the same time helping reduce widening inequality. What do you think?

https://www.facebook.com/RBReich?fref=nf

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
from Robert Reich (Original Post) elleng Jun 2014 OP
Seems like it could mesh with the tiered utility rates already in use dougolat Jun 2014 #1

dougolat

(716 posts)
1. Seems like it could mesh with the tiered utility rates already in use
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jun 2014

Many electric, gas, and water charges have a lower rate for the first "block" used, with higher rates charged for higher consumption.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»from Robert Reich