Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:26 AM Mar 2013

A Disastrous Year for Bees: 'We Can't Keep Them Alive'





The New York Times
Published on Mar 29, 2013


For America's beekeepers, who have struggled for nearly a decade with a mysterious malady called colony collapse disorder that kills honeybees en masse, this past year was particularly bad.


17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Disastrous Year for Bees: 'We Can't Keep Them Alive' (Original Post) marmar Mar 2013 OP
du rec. nt xchrom Mar 2013 #1
If bees disappear, man will disappear within 4 years. ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #2
Yet, chervilant Mar 2013 #3
What an absurd mischaracterization of our discussion elsewhere! Robb Mar 2013 #4
That's a distraction. Blanks Mar 2013 #8
Commercial bee populations are unnaturally large. Robb Mar 2013 #9
Ok, big ag is the problem. Blanks Mar 2013 #11
But the commercial bees are *part* of big ag. Robb Mar 2013 #12
I'm aware. Blanks Mar 2013 #14
My goodness! chervilant Mar 2013 #15
Whenever I read these headlines I always wonder if they are specific to a location. We started jwirr Mar 2013 #17
The Evidence padruig Mar 2013 #5
No one is suggesting this is a normal winter die off. Robb Mar 2013 #6
What do you suppose is in those tanks? This is from the video: Robb Mar 2013 #7
Size, Treatment Strategies and Statistics padruig Mar 2013 #10
I know we are fortunate to have exclusively built our hives from local swarms. Robb Mar 2013 #13
Bees die, we die. It's that simple. n/t ProfessionalLeftist Mar 2013 #16
 

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)
2. If bees disappear, man will disappear within 4 years.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:34 AM
Mar 2013

.
.
.

ponder it

google it

whatever,

but we NEED to make a sincere effort to protect momma nature.

Let's take the War budgets and put it towards the environment????

Just a krazy kanuk thot . . .

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
3. Yet,
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:40 AM
Mar 2013

there are still people on DU who think that bees dying "en masse" can be explained as 'normal' winter die-offs.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
4. What an absurd mischaracterization of our discussion elsewhere!
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:03 AM
Mar 2013

Did you bother to read my post?

I keep bees. I care deeply about their survival.

Edited to add what I've said about the issue:

Changes in climate are undeniable; loss of commercial honeybees are documented. The issue is whether those bees would be dying off in the numbers described were they not already made less robust by commercial beekeeping practice.

Commercial beekeepers feed their bees antibiotics, appetite stimulants, amino acids, fluvalinate, coumaphos and much more; they put out extra pollen, and extra sugar in solution -- all practices that generate more honey. Which is the idea, from their perspective.

But you cannot tell me that beehives that are trucked all over, fed unnatural foodstuffs and medicines, and avoid normal seasonal die-offs are as robust as hives that stay in one place, and grow at a rate commensurate with the availability of natural pollen and nectar.

There are certainly environmental changes at work here; but a robust bee population would adapt to them more readily.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
8. That's a distraction.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:38 AM
Mar 2013

Certainly bad practices, such as you've mentioned, should be minimized or even discontinued, but there's plenty of evidence pointing to the cause of 'colony collapse disorder'.

These bees are dying off because they've incorporated the pesticide in with the seed. There's plenty of scientific evidence pointing to that as the problem; the practice just needs to be shut down as it has in other countries (or at least one other country).

Robb

(39,665 posts)
9. Commercial bee populations are unnaturally large.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:43 AM
Mar 2013

The USDA acknowledges this:

Normal colonies can be stimulated to have larger populations by providing them with adequate supplemental foods. This feeding should be started 6 to 8 weeks in advance of when package bees or queens are to be produced. Overwintered colonies in the Northern States cap be fed supplementary foods early enough to be divided before the major nectar flow or the need for pollination service.


It is not a distraction to suggest that the pace and scope of monoculture commercial farming is outdistancing the ability of natural pollinators to keep up without massive, unnatural changes to the way they grow and reproduce.

The reality of this does not obviate the need to use far fewer pesticides than we do, quite the contary; these are two symptoms of the same problem (big ag), not causes for each other.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
11. Ok, big ag is the problem.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:54 AM
Mar 2013

These bee colonies are collapsing because of a particular method of incorporating the pesticide into the seed.

That practice needs to be stopped immediately, and the guilty parties need to be held accountable for the damage that they've done to the natural environment, and 'innovations' such as this should be strongly discouraged.

Once that has been accomplished, it makes sense to evaluate these other practices for the problems that they create, but there is a simple 'cause and effect' relationship with these pesticides and it needs to be stopped first. Trying to evaluate these other practices until that is accomplished is a distraction IMHO.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
12. But the commercial bees are *part* of big ag.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:02 PM
Mar 2013

Enormous tracts of single species crops cannot flourish at the levels the "market" demands without commercial bees introduced -- any more than they can "keep pace" without these genetically engineered pesticide-laced seeds.

These are problems that present themselves as part of the same issue -- massive monolithic agriculture is simply not sustainable. CCD is supporting evidence of this.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
14. I'm aware.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:23 PM
Mar 2013

Last edited Sat Mar 30, 2013, 03:11 PM - Edit history (1)

And big ag bees need to be queued up as something to deal with from a sustainability perspective, but when it comes to CCD and bees, job one needs to be get these pesticides out of the seeds.

They are polluting the surrounding properties with this product; it is similar to discharging sewage into the stream, they should not be able to effect the 'people downstream'.

Shutting it down should be a higher priority than dismantling monoculture farming.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
15. My goodness!
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:44 PM
Mar 2013

I did NOT mention you (nor our dialogue on a separate thread) , AND I've been posting my concerns about bees for going on five years. In that time, I've had other DUers disparage and/or diminish my concerns. THAT is why I posted about "some DUers" herein above.

(And, yes, I read your last response in that other thread. Since you seem intent upon promoting your position, I'd already decided I was not going to continue my effort to determine whether you think contemporary pesticides contribute to CCD. FURTHERMORE, I've personally witnessed a severe decline in the honeybee population in the Ozarks, where Agri-businesses tend toward a similar myopic approach to raising chickens, turkeys and hogs.)

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
17. Whenever I read these headlines I always wonder if they are specific to a location. We started
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 01:28 PM
Mar 2013

keeping bees last year in NE-MN.

padruig

(133 posts)
5. The Evidence
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:05 AM
Mar 2013

The evidence and impact of colony collapse disorder (CCD) is not anecdotal nor reflecting a seasonal event.

It took a couple of years for it to finally catch up to the larger bee keepers here in Washington State, then everyone started to see hive losses from 50 to 90 percent.

While we do experience some die off during the winter months, CCD is quite different in that healthy hives will suddenly fail in a period as short as a month.

We've seen some evidence that it was a virus but the evidence that it is correlated with the increased used of a new class of pesticides has everyone concerned.

Pollination services in the US alone is a 3 billion dollar a year industry and is responsible for one quarter of all our agricultural production. A typical bee hive is a $250 dollar investment, a 'package' consisting of a queen and three pounds of bees is $125. A queen alone can easily be up to $80 depending on the time of year and the breeder.

When CCD first began to struck, hives were in such demand that the cost of a hive to pollinate the almonds drove quickly up wards from $45 a hive to $125-$145 a hive.

Of all agriculture that depends on commercial pollination, almonds make the most for keepers. If you were to look at the almond orchards, you'd see a hive on the end over every single row of trees.

CCD has shown no evidence of either geographic or species preference.

Suggestions that this is simply a 'winter die off' are not born out by the data we have.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
6. No one is suggesting this is a normal winter die off.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:07 AM
Mar 2013

I ask whether commercial beekeepers' hives would be as large as they are were it not for the feeding of medicines and sugars, and the transporting them so as to never experience a winter die-off.

CCD has not been measured in either "wild" hives nor in naturally-kept ones. That should give us all pause.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
7. What do you suppose is in those tanks? This is from the video:
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:37 AM
Mar 2013


Also, in the first minute of the video you can see a keeper laying a medicine sachet back in place before closing the hive.

padruig

(133 posts)
10. Size, Treatment Strategies and Statistics
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:54 AM
Mar 2013

A number of good observations being made.

It does make statistical analysis a bit more tricky that the larger commercial pollinators transport their hives over large distances but not all pollinators truck state to state but remain well within state borders.

The distances traveled, the destinations, how a keeper manages their have and their treatment strategy would be working in as part of the data collection cycle.

Whether an individual keeper is using tetracycline for foul brood or a mitacide or is using one of the newer non chemical treatment strategies would be included as part of the data set.

Feral colonies would be left out of the populations.

Because of my elevation and location in the forest margin I choose last year to use a new hybrid of Carolinian queen (in part developed with WSU) While we didn't have the usual winter snow accumulations we did have some cold snaps so I was pleased to see that the Carolinian's survived well.

The only down side to the Carolinian is that the initial build up time from the package is longer than I've seen with my Italians or Russians.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
13. I know we are fortunate to have exclusively built our hives from local swarms.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:06 PM
Mar 2013

Just pure luck; one formed in our next-door-neighbor's front yard. We didn't even need a ladder!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»A Disastrous Year for Bee...