Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 02:59 PM Jun 2013

Holder Calls Voting Rights Act Ruling a ‘Serious’ Setback

Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. vowed Tuesday that the Justice Department would continue to enforce the Voting Rights Act around the country, even though he called the U.S. Supreme Court's decision, voiding a key provision in the law, "a serious and unnecessary setback."

Delivering a statement at Main Justice, Holder said the Justice Department will "continue to carefully monitor jurisdictions around the country for voting changes that may hamper voting rights."

"Let me be very clear: we will not hesitate to take swift enforcement action—using every legal tool that remains available to us—against any jurisdiction that seeks to take advantage of the Supreme Court’s ruling by hindering eligible citizens' full and free exercise of the franchise," Holder said.


Holder, who often hails his protection of voting and civil rights as one of his proudest achievements at the helm of the Justice Department, did not take any questions today. Absent from the podium was Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez, who has led the department's Civil Rights Division since 2009.

The high court in its decision today voided the section of the Voting Rights Act that addresses the formula that's used to determine when a state or local jurisdiction warrants special scrutiny before implementing electoral changes. Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., writing for the majority, said Section 4 is "unconstitutional in light of current conditions."

The Justice Department has won Voting Rights Act cases over the last 18 months, which Holder called a sign that "the need for a vital—and intact—Voting Rights Act remains clear."

Federal courts cited the value of the law in blocking the Texas congressional redistricting map because it discriminated against Latino voters, and the value in prompting South Carolina to no longer disproportionately impact black voters, Holder said.

More at: http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2013/06/holder-calls-voting-rights-act-ruling-a-serious-setback.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holder Calls Voting Rights Act Ruling a ‘Serious’ Setback (Original Post) Playinghardball Jun 2013 OP
Whatever, Holder. LuvLoogie Jun 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Holder Calls Voting Right...