Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumlib_wit_it
(2,222 posts)the Obama campaign's rebuttal. Listening to that screechy bitch is like hearing nails on a chalkboard. Steve Schmidt should have his own special circle of hell for leashing this grifter upon us.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)without saying a single thing about your opponent.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." Napoleon I
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)It's only an incoherent string of words, a bunch of casually related nouns without a verb. What she said made no sense at all.
It's hard to argue with that kind of crap. How is any one supposed to get an handle on it to answer her accusations? On the end, there's nothing there.
lib_wit_it
(2,222 posts)reasonable. They don't need no fancy syntactical logic. As long as the general message is "Obama bad." or "Liberals evil" then the message is clear enough for them.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Maybe it appeals to those who were bolstering the Frat Boy's approval ratings into the mid-twenties at the end of his occupation in the White House.
I'm not too worried about the some of the people the Koch Brothers can fool all of the time, unless they're disrupting town hall meetings or lynching somebody. At the ballot box, they're too small in numbers to have a big impact.
All we need to do to defeat the Palinistas is get the truth out. There are no death panels. The economy is slowly improving, not hemorrhaging jobs like it was during the Bush years and middle class taxes are lower, not higher. Such empirical facts may not appeal to right wing morons (that's why they're morons), but they have been known to impress independent voters in swing states.
lib_wit_it
(2,222 posts)force as your say. I mean, didn't nearly half of the country (who voted) vote for a ticket with McCain (bad enough) and Palin (shockingly bad) on it? And their numbers seem to be growing. I hope you are correct and I'm just paranoid!
greiner3
(5,214 posts)Will drag us back to 'the past when we had racial and class discrimination."
So Sarah, you are saying it was the whites who were subject to being slaves prior to the American Civil War?
"You repeat a lie ofter enough it becomes the truth and the bigger the lie is the more people will believe it." Hermann Goebbels, Nazi propaganda chief.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)that is trying to scrub slavery out of history text books for schools:
http://www.care2.com/causes/tenn-tea-party-demands-slavery-removed-from-textbooks.html
If they can succeed, then this kind of shit rhetoric can succeed.
it was spalin's ancestors who benefited from caste/class distinction the most and using society and shame to keep people "in their place", in spite of their skin color.
remember--the people who watch that network and that show do not read and are not educated... they are on their knees in front of their televisions, sucking furiously. It's what happens when one mainlines fux noose.
Moostache
(9,897 posts)there ought to be a moratorium on all things Palin...she is so bereft of cogent thoughts that it is borderline criminal...after 4+ years in the limelight she STILL sounds like a junior high school debate team member.
I am sickened by the very sound of her voice.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Just watching and listening to him can kill brain cells.
marshall gaines
(347 posts)ms. Palin's remarks are part of the silly prattle she has foisted on the intelligence of human beings since being unleashed on an unsuspecting public. Sadly, I fear she will be around for a while with her pit bull remarks. The lady is a dangerous sick joke from the party that gave us 9/11.
eyewall
(674 posts)tells one everything they need to know about the right.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)jjewell
(618 posts)Strikes out again...