Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thomhartmann

(3,979 posts)
Wed May 28, 2014, 05:22 PM May 2014

Thom Hartmann: You Can Be Subversive on Jury Duty



Everyday Americans have the power - and the constitutional right - to just say "no" to Nixon's War on Drugs. Tune in and find out this subversive technique.

The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann on RT TV & FSTV "live" 9pm and 11pm check www.thomhartmann.com/tv for local listings
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thom Hartmann: You Can Be Subversive on Jury Duty (Original Post) thomhartmann May 2014 OP
Jury nullification has been a growing movement dixiegrrrrl May 2014 #1
if you intend to use jury nullification you probably should keep that notion under your hat... Agony May 2014 #2
K&R DeSwiss May 2014 #3
It is illegal to lie as a juror Evergreen Emerald May 2014 #4
Yes, we can. nt bemildred May 2014 #5

Agony

(2,605 posts)
2. if you intend to use jury nullification you probably should keep that notion under your hat...
Wed May 28, 2014, 08:05 PM
May 2014

"And, yes, a juror may be removed if the judge learns that he or she is intending to exercise jury nullification. Consider the 1997 ruling in United States v. Thomas:

We consider below whether a juror’s intent to convict or acquit regardless of the evidence constitutes a basis for the juror’s removal during the course of deliberations under Rule 23(b). ? We also consider what constitutes sufficient evidence of that intent in light of the limitations on a presiding judge’s authority to investigate allegations of nullification required by the need to safeguard the secrecy of jury deliberations. ? We conclude, inter alia, that-as an obvious violation of a juror’s oath and duty-a refusal to apply the law as set forth by the court constitutes grounds for dismissal under Rule 23(b). ? We also conclude that the importance of safeguarding the secrecy of the jury deliberation room, coupled with the need to protect against the dismissal of a juror based on his doubts about the guilt of a criminal defendant, require that a juror be dismissed for a refusal to apply the law as instructed only where the record is clear beyond doubt that the juror is not, in fact, simply unpersuaded by the prosecution’s case."

much more here, in fact if you are called for jury duty you might want to read a lot more here...

http://fija.org Fully Informed Jury Association


FIJA works to:
• Inform potential jurors of their traditional, legal authority to refuse to enforce unjust laws
• Inform potential jurors that they cannot be required to check their consciences at the courthouse door
• Inform potential jurors that they cannot be punished for their verdicts
• Inform everyone that juror veto—jury nullification—is a peaceful way to protect human rights against corrupt politicians and government tyranny

cheers,
Agony

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
3. K&R
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:29 AM
May 2014
“If opposition is not enough, we must resist. If resistance is not enough, we must subvert.”

-Ed Abbey

Evergreen Emerald

(13,070 posts)
4. It is illegal to lie as a juror
Thu May 29, 2014, 09:31 AM
May 2014

Jurors take oaths to follow the law, even if they don't like it. There are ways to change laws we disagree with.

Mucking up the system by lying in an attempt to push your own agenda is not democracy.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Thom Hartmann: You Can Be...