Updated for the 21st century.

Maybe its just me but isn't 15 minutes kind of a long time??

I though D.U. was beyond using sexualized imagery of women to push a story.

Seems pretty appropriate to me.

...do you think is appropriate for advertising a cannabis-based genital lubricant that purports to extend orgasms?

- Hmmm......

[center] - or - [/center]

Perhaps those who initially view this would have taken a more serious consideration of the product's value. As applied to the scope of medicinal marijuana, at least.
Error on their part, by far.

I didn't even click on the vid, as "Woman in the Throes of Sexual Ecstasy" is one of the most repetitive (and ultimately boring) tropes on the net.

...but it's still an uphill battle here at DU when it comes to ''Alternative Medicine.''

- So, in the mean time while we wait for them to catch up, here ya go:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017171541

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017163506

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017198554

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024694060

http://www.democraticunderground.com/122016376

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024476110

http://www.democraticunderground.com/122016003

http://www.democraticunderground.com/122014795

K&R!

Fact that this enhancement spray on based in marijuana "science" is sold only as medicinal, supports yet another purpose for those who wish to venture into alternative medicines for whatever someone's health related needs may be.

A sexist ad using a highly sexualized image of a woman to sell what is likely the modern equivalent of snake oil. Right to the trash AND IL you go.

My apologies to any offended. I would have preferred the original pic on the video I originally viewed.

My point again is that there is a need for a Marijuana Forum.

Shall check on the link when I return home tonite.