Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumObama Promised a "World Without Nuclear Weapons," But May Now Spend $3 Trillion on Weapons Upgrades
democracynow
Published on Oct 24, 2014
We are on the road in the historic city of Vienna, Austria, not far from the Czech Republic where President Obama gave a major address in 2009 that called for a nuclear-free world.
His disarmament efforts were cited when he won the Nobel Peace Prize, but since then advocates say little progress has been made.
A recent New York Times investigation found the United States is on pace to spend as much as $1 trillion over the next three decades to modernize its nuclear arsenal and facilities.
This week, more than 150 countries at the United Nations signed a joint statement calling on nuclear powers to attend the third major conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons scheduled this December in Vienna.
The United States has yet to attend one of the meetings.
We are joined by Elena Sokova, executive director of the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation.
bananas
(27,509 posts)ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)I read it. But I had just had some of Costco's first yearly shipment of Pennsylvania Dutch Eggnog with Rum, Brandy and Blended Whiskey, which is to die for and will be sold out in two days. Maybe I shouldn't have commented on the post at all. I'm probably the only one here that takes a nip and posts nearing the holidays. Sorry, Fred.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)uhnope
(6,419 posts)http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-By-President-Barack-Obama-In-Prague-As-Delivered
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Initech
(100,076 posts)Next republican who goes on about "excessive government spending" gets kicked in the ass.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Congress approves budgets, and Obama isn't trying to spend 3 trillion on this. Such HYPE.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)HoosierCowboy
(561 posts)... our strategy of deterence. Fixed land based ICBMs are becoming the equivalent of the Maginot Line. Survivability, not first strike capabilities are the key to deterence.
There's another point, as to what we need to deter, Russia? China? Risk management infers that those who won't suffer the consequences (NGOs) are the most likely to use nukes.