Video & Multimedia

thomhartmann

(3,979 posts) Fri May 4, 2012, 10:59 AM May 2012

Thom Hartmann: A Revolutionary Way to Re-Distribute Wealth

Dame Pauline Green, International Co-op Alliance & Paul Hazen, U.S. Overseas Cooperative Development Council, join Thom Hartmann. Raising taxes on the rich - raising the minimum wage - and putting restrictions on CEO pay have all been suggested as ways to reduce wealth inequality in America. While these ideas can help - shouldn't we be looking at more revolutionary ways to re-distribute wealth in our country?

The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann on RT TV & FSTV "live" 9pm and 11pm check www.thomhartmann.com/tv for local listings

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thom Hartmann: A Revolutionary Way to Re-Distribute Wealth (Original Post) thomhartmann May 2012 OP

kick Dawson Leery May 2012 #1

this makes a lot of sense to me. zeemike May 2012 #2

+1 Sounds good in theory, how large were the companies and what did they sell? freshwest May 2012 #3

the one I saw made robotic machines. zeemike May 2012 #4

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)

1. kick

Reply to thomhartmann (Original post)

Fri May 4, 2012, 11:19 AM

May 2012

zeemike

(18,998 posts)

2. this makes a lot of sense to me.

Reply to thomhartmann (Original post)

Fri May 4, 2012, 11:55 AM

May 2012

And I saw one company where all the workers shared all the profits equally no matter what job they performed....and no management at all...it was run democratically with a vote...there was no CEO that just sucked out the profits and contributed nothing.
That I think is the future if we want to end the corporate oligarchy

freshwest

(53,661 posts)

3. +1 Sounds good in theory, how large were the companies and what did they sell?

Reply to zeemike (Reply #2)

Fri May 4, 2012, 12:09 PM

May 2012

zeemike

(18,998 posts)

4. the one I saw made robotic machines.

Reply to freshwest (Reply #3)

Fri May 4, 2012, 12:34 PM

May 2012

Don't know hoe how large they were....but small is a good thing the way I see it.

Reply to this discussion