Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

zebonaut

(3,688 posts) Sun Nov 15, 2015, 03:54 AM Nov 2015

Trump want to give France 30,000 gun deaths a year

And crossfire.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump want to give France 30,000 gun deaths a year (Original Post) zebonaut Nov 2015 OP

I really hate it when anyone say "Well you/they should have.... Crowman1979 Nov 2015 #1

Embarrassing that my hometown would show up and cheer for this clown, but Dustlawyer Nov 2015 #2

God he is a freaking idiot. More guns will not lead to less violence, if that was true the US would cstanleytech Nov 2015 #3

Trump is an idiot Gothmog Nov 2015 #4

Crowman1979

(3,844 posts)

1. I really hate it when anyone say "Well you/they should have....

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sun Nov 15, 2015, 05:03 AM

Nov 2015

Like I have a fucking time machine or some BS!

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)

2. Embarrassing that my hometown would show up and cheer for this clown, but

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sun Nov 15, 2015, 09:15 AM

Nov 2015

not surprising. This is Tea Party central.

If France had guns they could have an equivalent of these attacks EVERYDAY like we do. We probably lose more people everyday than what were killed in Paris!

cstanleytech

(26,322 posts)

3. God he is a freaking idiot. More guns will not lead to less violence, if that was true the US would

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:14 AM

Nov 2015

not be in the top 20 countries for people being killed with a gun.

Gothmog

(145,619 posts)

4. Trump is an idiot

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:35 AM

Nov 2015

Reply to this discussion