Video & Multimedia

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts) Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:50 PM Jan 2016

Clinton Attacks Show That They're Afraid | Bernie Sanders

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Attacks Show That They're Afraid | Bernie Sanders (Original Post) liberalnarb Jan 2016 OP

Or it's a normal political primary. Metric System Jan 2016 #1

Or the establishment is trembling in their boots. nt liberalnarb Jan 2016 #2

Serious Deja Vu in Camp Weathervane peacebird Jan 2016 #3

Dirty mudslinging is a turn off, man. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #9

When We Stand Together - No Citizen Need Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go cantbeserious Jan 2016 #4

That's the problem of the establishment selling us a weak candidate R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2016 #5

again, they absolutely didn't expect a primary: they'd just run a feelgood GE campaign MisterP Jan 2016 #6

And it's dangerous. R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2016 #7

the Coakleys and Clintons keep the checks rolling--checks that are the same amount win or lose MisterP Jan 2016 #8

Metric System

(6,048 posts)

1. Or it's a normal political primary.

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:51 PM

Jan 2016

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)

2. Or the establishment is trembling in their boots. nt

Reply to Metric System (Reply #1)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:52 PM

Jan 2016

peacebird

(14,195 posts)

3. Serious Deja Vu in Camp Weathervane

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:53 PM

Jan 2016

And her campaign surrogates dirty mudslinging is not helping her....

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

9. Dirty mudslinging is a turn off, man.

Reply to peacebird (Reply #3)

Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:34 AM

Jan 2016

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)

4. When We Stand Together - No Citizen Need Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:55 PM

Jan 2016

eom

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)

5. That's the problem of the establishment selling us a weak candidate

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:57 PM

Jan 2016

with questionable priorities/motives and a reduced debate schedule.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)

6. again, they absolutely didn't expect a primary: they'd just run a feelgood GE campaign

Reply to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #5)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:12 PM

Jan 2016

that appeals to everyone (not all at once, mind you) and terminate any dissent with the usual "SCOTUS SCOTUS" squawking

they thought that since Sanders was the leftmost Senator he wouldn't crack 5%

they didn't just misread the situation, their entire worldview is incapable of understanding what's happening

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)

7. And it's dangerous.

Reply to MisterP (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:24 PM

Jan 2016

Massachusetts had it's AG, Martha Coakley, run twice: one against Scott Brown and then for Governor against Charlie Baker.

Guess what happened twice? Her campaign underestimated and seemed like they just were expecting a win. She lost badly.

We can't have a candidate, with questionable motive or morals, that acts like a conservative and expect them to win against a real conservative: fucking crazy as they are.

Voters will stay home, and Independents outnumber both Democrats and Republicans.

That's why I'm behind Bernie Sanders. At least he's honest about who he is.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)

8. the Coakleys and Clintons keep the checks rolling--checks that are the same amount win or lose

Reply to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:26 PM

Jan 2016

Reply to this discussion