Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

GoLeft TV

(3,910 posts) Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:11 PM Feb 2016

The Republican Healthcare Plan: Try To Not Die

Donald Trump said in an interview this past weekend that he’ll figure something out when it comes to replacing Obamacare, staying in line with the Republican theme of having absolutely no plan to actually fix anything.

Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Republican Healthcare Plan: Try To Not Die (Original Post) GoLeft TV Feb 2016 OP

Almost convinces one that ANY Dem is not just better than the cons, but it might randys1 Feb 2016 #1

like grasyson said - the gop is dont get sick and if you do die quickly saturnsring Feb 2016 #2

and die quietly. NCjack Feb 2016 #4

That's a side splitter... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #3

randys1

(16,286 posts)

1. Almost convinces one that ANY Dem is not just better than the cons, but it might

Reply to GoLeft TV (Original post)

Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:14 PM

Feb 2016

be a matter of life and death for some.

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)

2. like grasyson said - the gop is dont get sick and if you do die quickly

Reply to GoLeft TV (Original post)

Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:18 PM

Feb 2016

NCjack

(10,279 posts)

4. and die quietly.

Reply to saturnsring (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 1, 2016, 07:17 PM

Feb 2016

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)

3. That's a side splitter...

Reply to GoLeft TV (Original post)

Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:19 PM

Feb 2016

Does it require hookers?

I'll have to see what ROF says... Personally, this asshole can't take himself seriously with lines like that. Oh, wait... he never did!

Reply to this discussion