Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TYT: Love Obama? This Will Piss You Off (But You Need To Hear It) (Original Post) WhoIsNumberNone Jun 2012 OP
There's nothing to add to this piece. Citizen Worker Jun 2012 #1
Cenk.... Plucketeer Jun 2012 #2
WHOA! He didn't pull any punches there! HopeHoops Jun 2012 #3
K&R....John McCain...what a duplicitous...but hoping to get re-elected...still good! KoKo Jun 2012 #4
I've felt the same way too many times over the last 3 years, bvar22 Jun 2012 #5
A USSC decision can be overturned in only two ways -- AtomicKitten Jun 2012 #6
Cenk discusses both of those Enrique Jun 2012 #7
Exactly right. n/t Cali_Democrat Jun 2012 #8
I saw the original broadcast. AtomicKitten Jun 2012 #12
Obama can't overrule it, but he could be speaking out against it over and over. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #9
He crafted an executive order to do an end-run around Citizens United. AtomicKitten Jun 2012 #11
yes we all cheered him when he started talking about that executive order Enrique Jun 2012 #13
Kick n/t ihavenobias Jun 2012 #14
Ah crap. Well the RW wailing about it was fun. AtomicKitten Jun 2012 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Jun 2012 #10
 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
2. Cenk....
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 02:06 PM
Jun 2012

I concur with EVERY word you've said here. Simply having a (D) next to your name is NOT a defining point. Fact is, I could easily come up with other terms that these (D)s could stand for - none of them flattering, of course.
So MANY potential voters out there - duped by the flash and dazzle of 30-second propaganda bites as well as outRight lies - there's NO chance for a voice of reason and genuine compassion to elbow past deception and bullshit. In this nation of Rambo-esque - trample the meek and plunder what's left - thinking, too many dolts are gleefully cutting off their noses to show their faces who's boss. And doing so to prove their with the "winning team" instead of the wussies. If they'd have paid attention in Bioloigy class, they'd maybe realize that NO ecosystem where there's only predators can last too long. Too bad the Justice Party can't get some traction. We NEED a fresh broom to work with.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
5. I've felt the same way too many times over the last 3 years,
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 07:12 PM
Jun 2012

...and unless those of us to The Left of Ronald Reagan find some way
to make our voices heard and our votes count,
NOTHING is going to "change".


You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
6. A USSC decision can be overturned in only two ways --
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 09:46 PM
Jun 2012

I really like Cenk but too frequently his emotions overrule reality, and the reality here is that Pres Obama does not have the power to overturn a USSC ruling. Either the USSC reverses the decision by making a contradictory decision on a current case - or - Congress AND the States can overturn it by amending the Constitution.

Railing against Citizens United at the 2010 SOTU address was probably the most attention the president could bring to the issue.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
7. Cenk discusses both of those
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 10:55 PM
Jun 2012

im not sure if you watched the video,but this is in response to an action by John MCain and 22 state AGs, filing briefs to the Supreme Court arguing against Citizens United. I dont know if Cenk mentioned it but Sheldon Whitehouse also joined them. It seems to stem from a case in Montana which is headed to the SCOTUS.

Regarding the constitutional amendment, Cenk has formed a PAC dedicated to getting such an amendment passed, that corporations are not people and therefore do not have first amendment rights.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
12. I saw the original broadcast.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 05:23 AM
Jun 2012

Cenk completely misses the magnitude of the POTUS chastising the Supreme Court sitting right in front of him at the SOUA seen on national TV by millions. No reasonable person would conclude that he "just doesn't give a damn." Regarding the briefs referenced, I don't know anybody privy to what the Justice Dept is doing or not doing on this.

I like Cenk, always have, but suggesting O has no problem with Citizens United and that he just doesn't give a damn is straight-up horseshit. His rant was driven 5% on facts and 95% on emotion. Big guy needs to hug it out.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
9. Obama can't overrule it, but he could be speaking out against it over and over.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 12:35 AM
Jun 2012

He has not done much to support a constitutional amendment to change it.

A speech, a statement in the State of the Union and then what? Not much if anything. This should be a priority.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
11. He crafted an executive order to do an end-run around Citizens United.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 01:51 AM
Jun 2012

Last edited Fri Jun 8, 2012, 05:05 AM - Edit history (1)

Obama’s New Weapon v. Citizens United
link: http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/obamas_new_weapon_v_citizens_united/

With a stroke of his pen, Obama Fights Back at Citizens United
http://www.politicususa.com/obama-citizens-united.html

And it sure made the Rs cranky --

An executive order in the old Chicago tradition
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/21/an-executive-order-in-the-old-chicago-tradition/

AEI: Overruling Citizens United with Chicago-Style Politics
http://www.aei.org/article/politics-and-public-opinion/judicial/constitutional/overruling-emcitizens-unitedem-with-chicago-style-politics/

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
13. yes we all cheered him when he started talking about that executive order
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 08:28 AM
Jun 2012

and you're right, the RW bashed him over it. Especially the Chamber of Commerce.

He decided to go with the bashers:



http://www.republicreport.org/2012/obama-contractor-giveup/

President Obama could take action right now to help clean up our election system. Last month, we published a list of different steps Obama could take immediately, including issuing executive orders and using the S.E.C. to require publicly traded companies to disclose political spending for investors. But as The Hill’s Mike Lillis reports, the administration appears to be abandoning the idea of issuing an executive order mandating that government contractors disclose their campaign spending:

A year ago, the White House composed a draft executive order that would have forced potential government contractors to reveal their political spending as a condition of submitting bids. But roughly 12 months later, no final order has been issued, and supporters and critics alike say they’ve seen no signs such a change is forthcoming.


Government contractors, including big military companies and for-profit enterprises that depend on taxpayer funds, are known for using large sums of money to buy influence.

Obama’s capitulation can be seen as a product of intense lobbying from K Street interests. Lobbying front groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which represents major government contractors like CSC and United Technologies, led the effort to block the disclosure executive order. A top Chamber lobbyist even compared the disclosure idea to war, saying that his organization would fight the rule just as allied forces fought Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya.

(...)

Response to WhoIsNumberNone (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»TYT: Love Obama? This Wil...