Video & Multimedia

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts) Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:21 PM Apr 2016

Bill Press: Hillary's Hit List

https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=p2uokZgpBaY

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill Press: Hillary's Hit List (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 OP

AND that is why our congress rushed to endorse them. jwirr Apr 2016 #1

It makes sense for politicians to be organized and keep a list of voters, or supporters, Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #2

at least Nixon didn't get a 153 million dollars in "speaking fees". ish of the hammer Apr 2016 #3

In todays Washington evironment Nixons offenses would have been laughed at INdemo Apr 2016 #5

Releasing her transcripts won't prove otherwise, I'm afraid... freebrew Apr 2016 #8

Well..thats true too.If Hillary will not be honest with the voters INdemo Apr 2016 #10

Duplicity Is As Duplicity Does cantbeserious Apr 2016 #4

Why are people starting to report about this now? We have known about this for years. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #6

Hit this, Hillary. downeastdaniel Apr 2016 #7

the parallel between Clinton and Nixon is remarkable. ish of the hammer Apr 2016 #9

jwirr

(39,215 posts)

1. AND that is why our congress rushed to endorse them.

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:29 PM

Apr 2016

Under those circumstances I think that we can ignore their endorsements. In fact that goes for the Super-Delegates also.

The Clintons are our King John of England.

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)

2. It makes sense for politicians to be organized and keep a list of voters, or supporters,

Reply to jwirr (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:42 PM

Apr 2016

But the Clinton's have really mastered this skill and hey they do win because of it. Every campaign has to keep lists but it's how they use it that is also interesting.

You're right that's one big reason they locked in all the endorsements.

ish of the hammer

(444 posts)

3. at least Nixon didn't get a 153 million dollars in "speaking fees".

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:02 PM

Apr 2016

INdemo

(6,994 posts)

5. In todays Washington evironment Nixons offenses would have been laughed at

Reply to ish of the hammer (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:21 PM

Apr 2016

and the House and Senate would have moved on and Nixon would have served out his term.
Take a look at all the things sent to lock down and not even the slightest hint about Hillary corrupt activities.
Releasing her speech transcripts (which she wont) would go a long way to prove otherwise.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)

8. Releasing her transcripts won't prove otherwise, I'm afraid...

Reply to INdemo (Reply #5)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:42 PM

Apr 2016

it will prove exactly what many of us suspect.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)

10. Well..thats true too.If Hillary will not be honest with the voters

Reply to freebrew (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 11, 2016, 07:40 AM

Apr 2016

now by releasing her speech transcripts then why should we expect her to be honest with us if she is elected?
GoldmanSachs owns her.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)

4. Duplicity Is As Duplicity Does

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:10 PM

Apr 2016

eom

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)

6. Why are people starting to report about this now? We have known about this for years.

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:17 PM

Apr 2016

Do people in the know expect some bad news to come out about Hillary? Are people starting to lower expectations of a Hillary win in the primaries?

Inquiring minds want to know.

downeastdaniel

(497 posts)

7. Hit this, Hillary.

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:30 PM

Apr 2016

ish of the hammer

(444 posts)

9. the parallel between Clinton and Nixon is remarkable.

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 05:10 PM

Apr 2016

so when do we get the updated 1952 "checkers" speech about her 153 million dollars?

Reply to this discussion