sad, but not surprising

Because I enjoyed your posts, i.e. used to!

Hillary, while Secretory of State, did expose national security secrets residing on her private E-mail server that was in her home, by sending and receiving E-mails with a person she was using as an adviser, without any security clearance on their part..

She exposed national security secrets?

You do know that the State Department servers were actually hacked right?

There's been no proof or evidence that her personal servers were hacked.

to protect classified information?

Of course you do. If you were so stupid as to not know that then using a computer would be too difficult for you.

Surely you must be repeating that failed excuse for a different reason. Care to clarify your motivations for us here?

Just checking those who seem to be salivating at the notion of wrong doing.

There's no excuse, just fact, something you obviously have no understanding of.

Having your own stand alone E-mail server exposed to the Internet is just asking for it. You have no way of knowing if it was or not anyway. The odds are that is was hacked numerous times. Both Russia and China are good at it, and cleaning up their footprints when they leave.

Benghazi and the server nor the FBI know?

Do share!

And I had a security clearance. What's your expertise here?

Then what in your background involving government computers makes you qualified to pass a ridiculous accusation involving factual and legal matters you know nothing about?

And what in the world does my expertise have to do with anything you make up?

You don't have any expertise on this and you question mine?
The FBI would not be investigating Hillary's E-mail server for this long, if there wasn't anything to investigate.

And you keep second-guessing the FBI?

Pahleeeze! I will not even challenge your claims of expertise. They are irrelevant.

You are not giving me your opinion on Hillary's computer security. You are giving me your opinion on something you are clueless about: the content of Hillary's server and how it relates to national security - something you know jack shit about. What you are saying is, because you allege to be an expert in computer security, Hillary is guilty.

WTF?

I said "Because I am better educated on computer security than you." Apparently that is a lower bar than I thought.
It is your claims of computer security expertise that are in question here, for thinking Hillary's private server, that she used for off government storage of government information and documents, while SoS, is no big deal.
Try telling the FBI that. See how long they let you stick around before rolling their eyes and telling you need to leave their building.

This is your post, no?

But I suspect that an average educated person shares this refgrettable shortcoming with me.

up by Bernie fans.

that all he did was read from newspapers?

Of course not... you didn't watch the video did you?

to know that it's all part of a vast right wing conspiracy.

We all know that all left wingers like Mike Malloy are part of a vast right wing conspiracy. Besides, in opposing Hillary, Malloy only exposes himself as a misogynist who probably beats his wife to keep her from supporting Hillary, like all good Democrats do.

Totally forgot!

eom

But, you're no better than the Right-Wing nuts on Fox. Probably not as intelligent as them. We true democrats really, really, don't need your ilk in our efforts to elect a democratic president.

Thank you fort reading this.

eom

Bob-Bye

So far.

Sure you are. What a despicable post. Please, go back to the dark side.

And welcome to ignore.

By the way, "Thank you fort reading this". No. Just no.

Seriously? I think I know why you started with the disclaimer "I'm a Sanders Supporter." (Yeah, and I'm green with pink polka dots...)

(P. S. Updating my IL, etc.)

Which is probably true no matter the political affiliation of the director. If she is thought to have broken laws the FBI will state it, if not then they will state that too.

I see why some try to pretend that's reality. So much easier. But the truth is this class war is between the Progressive Wing and the Conservative Wing of our Party. The Oligarchy runs the Republicon Party and the Conservative (ala Clinton) Wing of our Party. The Oligarchy has made it clear that Clinton is their candidate. They won't let any harm come to her. They hundreds of millions invested.

who answers to the Attorney General, also appointed by President Obama.

Your point is what?

Why do you seemingly want her to be guilty of some type of wrongdoing?

Just so Sen. Sanders might win?

Maybe you can use that ability to win the lottery.

She could be the first president to serve while behind bars!

My dog Rusty posed the same question over dinner, and that REALLY made me sit up and take notice. Smart dog

Some dude reading a VF article that rehashes inconsequential snippets from MSM?

Was it to let us know that someone named Mike Malloy exists and can read?

Gee, thanks!

Instead of people on both sides making assertions about it, how about they just tell us what is going on.
Did Clinton do something that was illegal, immoral or fattening, or what?

Various agencies investigate because that's what they do for a living. As often as not, the investigation clears someone's name, and points somewhere else.

A "potential scandal" has the power to hurt someone in the court of public opinion, which is what so many of you are panting after. The GOP (which has hated both Clintons from the time they first laid eyes on them) and The Left (bless your hearts) want so badly for this to be true -- >shaking my head<

She's looking at ten years!

Please send me a link

out to be the republican way to miss use a national tragedy for their own gains. Any apologies from anyone? Especially the members of the left that instead of being skeptical, did the republican work for them?

let's see what the email server turns out to be.

keeps on dragging on, quite a bit like Hillary's failure to secure the nomination keeps on dragging on.

I'm beginning to come to the conclusion that someone who truly despises her is in charge of this investigation, and is just waiting until either after she finally has enough pledged delegates, or until after she secures the nomination (finally!) at the convention, and then indicts.

It would completely destroy her chance of winning the GE, and any replacement for her would be likewise totally fucked.

And if she doesn't get the nomination? The entire investigation may finally end without any indictment, because it will no longer matter.

I think the email thing keeps dragging on because TPTB want it to drag on until she makes it through to the convention.

Then one of two things happen:

1) TPTB try to slip Biden in.

2) HRC thinks she can make it through the election because IT'S HER TURN.

eta: After re-reading your post, I updated mine.

are not part of this.* It's my opinion (and opinion only as I have no access to any information other than what we all read about in all of the public places) that whoever the one person in charge of the investigation into the email thing personally has it it for her.

Slipping in Biden isn't going to happen. Or even if it somehow could -- and the only possibility of that I can see is that she selects him as her VP, she's forced to drop out of the head of the ticket place after the convention, not before, and he therefore gets bumped up to the head of the ticket. If all hell breaks loose before the Convention, I find it hard to picture the delegates moving over to Biden in large enough numbers, certainly not to elect him on the first go-around. If such hell has broken loose prior to the convention, it would all hinge on what the pledged Hillary delegates choose to do. As well as the unpledged super delegates.

In any case, that won't happen smoothly. It will be a very nasty rerun of what happened in 1972, especially if she gets the nomination and then is forced to drop out, and will disgust so many people that essentially hardly anyone will bother to vote for the Democrat at the top of the ticket come November.

No matter what you, or anyone else reading this thinks of my hypothesis, I want to emphasize that it is highly speculative.

*Your definition of TPTB may well include the person in charge of the FBI investigation.

I think it's a possibility -- the party and the DNC are that clueless that they would try it.

jmo

to see how this all plays out.

jmo

We'll just have to wait and see.