Video & Multimedia

KALD

(128 posts) Mon Oct 31, 2016, 10:36 AM Oct 2016

"Kellyanne Conway refuses to address Trump child rape case on CNBC "

Maybe now other media outlets will bring up this case.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Kellyanne Conway refuses to address Trump child rape case on CNBC " (Original Post) KALD Oct 2016 OP

This woman should spontaneously combust. onecaliberal Oct 2016 #1

Nor should she say anything. What would she say? Buzz Clik Oct 2016 #2

Doesn't matter what she said or didn't say. I'm just glad the topic was mentioned on TV. KALD Oct 2016 #3

"I can't believe you would analogize the two"...and I agree with her. CincyDem Oct 2016 #4

Wow! Kellyanne has defenders right here on the DU. I think the point the host was making is that KALD Oct 2016 #6

I'm sorry that my phrasing implied I was supporting her. CincyDem Oct 2016 #13

Weiner texting pictures of genitals isn't even CLOSE to tying a 13-year old girl... George II Oct 2016 #5

Thank you! KALD Oct 2016 #7

That's my thinking as well Plucketeer Oct 2016 #8

She and the Trump camp have nothing else by 'emails' on their mind and mouths till Nov 8-that is riversedge Oct 2016 #9

Kellyanne is an Alt-Righter and proven LIAR. Of course she refuses to address the Trump child rape BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #10

Agreed. The thing is if Bill Clinton had a case coming up in court accusing him KALD Oct 2016 #11

Exactly. He wasn't impeached for having an extramarital affair. He was impeached for lying BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #12

BlueCaliDem, you are awesome! KALD Oct 2016 #14

Aw thanks, KALD. {{{hugs}}} eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #16

Why don't they challenge her lies? Coyotl Oct 2016 #15

onecaliberal

(32,898 posts)

1. This woman should spontaneously combust.

Reply to KALD (Original post)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 10:39 AM

Oct 2016

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)

2. Nor should she say anything. What would she say?

Reply to KALD (Original post)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 10:40 AM

Oct 2016

KALD

(128 posts)

3. Doesn't matter what she said or didn't say. I'm just glad the topic was mentioned on TV.

Reply to Buzz Clik (Reply #2)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 10:45 AM

Oct 2016

She doesn't mind speculating on Hillary and how many laws she allegedly broke.

CincyDem

(6,386 posts)

4. "I can't believe you would analogize the two"...and I agree with her.

Reply to KALD (Original post)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 10:52 AM

Oct 2016

If (and I say IF) there are some emails in the wrong place...that is absolutely NOTHING in comparison to the possibility that someone raped a child. She's right - there's absolutely NO comparison.

WTF is with these asshats.

KALD

(128 posts)

6. Wow! Kellyanne has defenders right here on the DU. I think the point the host was making is that

Reply to CincyDem (Reply #4)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 11:01 AM

Oct 2016

Trump has his own set of legal issues if elected. That seems pretty easy to understand. She's the one that called Weiner. a pedophile for sending pics, but Trump is accused of raping a child. Both are scum IMO. What's with the "libs" who defend Kellyanne?

CincyDem

(6,386 posts)

13. I'm sorry that my phrasing implied I was supporting her.

Reply to KALD (Reply #6)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 12:12 PM

Oct 2016

And it reinforces the value of the sarcasm icon.

I do agree these are not the same but her point is that email scandal charges and worse than tape charges. They are very different and obviously rape charges are a much worse tragedy.

Sorry I gave you the impression I was a lib apologist.

George II

(67,782 posts)

5. Weiner texting pictures of genitals isn't even CLOSE to tying a 13-year old girl...

Reply to KALD (Original post)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 10:56 AM

Oct 2016

...to a bed and raping her.

KALD

(128 posts)

7. Thank you!

Reply to George II (Reply #5)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 11:01 AM

Oct 2016

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)

8. That's my thinking as well

Reply to George II (Reply #5)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 11:10 AM

Oct 2016

Joseph Goebbels would be proud of Ms. CONway. "Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play."

riversedge

(70,306 posts)

9. She and the Trump camp have nothing else by 'emails' on their mind and mouths till Nov 8-that is

Reply to KALD (Original post)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 11:12 AM

Oct 2016

ALL we will hear. They will pivot to emails endlessly. endlessly

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

10. Kellyanne is an Alt-Righter and proven LIAR. Of course she refuses to address the Trump child rape

Reply to KALD (Original post)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 11:31 AM

Oct 2016

case that's making its way through the Court- although she's more than happy to expound upon Weiner's sexting with a 15-year-old which isn't in Court. That, she believes, isn't ridiculous.

Kellyanne is an Alt-Rightwing shill, and she has zero credibility because SHE LIES SO MUCH.

KALD

(128 posts)

11. Agreed. The thing is if Bill Clinton had a case coming up in court accusing him

Reply to BlueCaliDem (Reply #10)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 11:40 AM

Oct 2016

of child rape. Hillary and every last one of her surrogates would have to discuss it. As much as I detest the other side...One thing about it right or wrong they know how to use messaging. Here we have folks questioning whether it's right to even bring it up.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

12. Exactly. He wasn't impeached for having an extramarital affair. He was impeached for lying

Reply to KALD (Reply #11)

Mon Oct 31, 2016, 11:50 AM

Oct 2016

about it under oath - something that should've never happened to begin with and what outraged the vast majority of Americans since he left office with around a 65% approval rating (at the time - some polls were higher, some lower).

Thing is, Republican messaging is only so good because their money-masters own the M$M and they're given ample opportunity to spill their toxic gall every minute of every day without being challenged.

Now, of course, Trump and his surrogates are kinda, sorta being challenged simply because the money-masters don't like Trump, and for no other reason. They don't believe he's a RWer (which they prefer). They still believe he's a liberal posing as a Republican, which has no factual basis when we look at his past.

Here we have folks questioning whether it's right to even bring it up.

I know. But I simply ignore them. I find it appalling that people on DU would even question if it's right to bring up Trump's child rape case when it's the deed rather than talking about it that's so wrong.