Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
General Michael Hayden Says The CIA Is Not Spying On Us Through Our Televisions (Original Post) bathroommonkey76 Mar 2017 OP
Back in the 1960's we had a family friend who was convinced that if you could look into the TV, Rollo Mar 2017 #1
I have the link, it was widely discussed ... the school that had kid's laptops RKP5637 Mar 2017 #2
It's possible bathroommonkey76 Mar 2017 #3
Not technically possible in 1965... Rollo Mar 2017 #4
The Soviets and Americans had bathroommonkey76 Mar 2017 #5
Sure, subminiature film cameras, not video cameras... Rollo Mar 2017 #6

Rollo

(2,559 posts)
1. Back in the 1960's we had a family friend who was convinced that if you could look into the TV,
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 11:06 AM
Mar 2017

The government could look back out at you. No amount of reasoning could shake her view.

Fast forward over 50 years, and the technology is finally at the point where that is possible, but the question remains the same: why the Hell would anyone WANT to see what you are doing in your home?

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
2. I have the link, it was widely discussed ... the school that had kid's laptops
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 11:14 AM
Mar 2017

setup so they could watch them in the privacy of their own home. I found it strange and quite weird. Here's the link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District

I'm just mentioning it in passing, not saying Hayden is wrong.

 

bathroommonkey76

(3,827 posts)
3. It's possible
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 11:23 AM
Mar 2017

someone in the IC's could hold a grudge against a neighbor, an ex, or someone who cut them off in traffic- you never know in today's world.

My friend has told me for years that this type of stuff is real- one of his relatives works in that world- The Wiki dump only reassures my belief that all of this is true.

Rollo

(2,559 posts)
4. Not technically possible in 1965...
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 04:30 PM
Mar 2017

TV cameras back then were huge, and there was no way one could be hidden in a consumer set without the owner knowing about it.

Modern "smart" TV's and notebook computers with built-in cameras, yeah, technically it could be done. Solution: don't buy electronics with built in cameras, or cover the lens. Cell phones? Keep them in a case that blocks the camera (front and rear) until you're ready to broadcast. LOL.

But people who believed it could be done in '65 were probably wearing tinfoil hats as well.

 

bathroommonkey76

(3,827 posts)
5. The Soviets and Americans had
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 04:51 PM
Mar 2017

cameras in birdhouses, shoes, neckties, boots, and wallets in the 60s- I doubt anyone expected cameras to be in those places back then. lol

I don't worry about modern technology-- Sept of last year I broke up with Verizon after 10 years. My internet usage is mostly news sites and Netflix.

Rollo

(2,559 posts)
6. Sure, subminiature film cameras, not video cameras...
Thu Mar 9, 2017, 01:35 AM
Mar 2017

The sub mini cameras used 16mm, 8mm, or smaller film for still photos. They didn't have miniature video capability. The technology for that was simply not there.

Here's a miniature TV camera from the 60's.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»General Michael Hayden Sa...