Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1955 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's talk about what Parnas gave up...Beau of the Fifth Column. (Original Post)
dewsgirl
Jan 2020
OP
bucolic_frolic
(43,359 posts)1. "We have a person inside."
Sounds like a reference to the Ambassador, but it could also be a reference to a mole that is feeding them information.
This is high stakes stuff.
Donnie referred to 4 embassies being at risk from the now-assassinated Iranian general .... projection again?
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)4. I definitely think there was a double agent.
Nitram
(22,907 posts)2. Is this information going to play a role in the impeachment? Sounds very serious.
If the House is going to continue impeachment investigations based on new evidence, there may very well be some very concrete evidence.
czarjak
(11,299 posts)3. Well oiled machine?