Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

pathansen

(1,039 posts) Wed Sep 12, 2012, 07:31 PM Sep 2012

Rmoney's Political Statement re: Libya attack backfires

Last edited Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:59 AM - Edit history (1)

How many more foreign policy mistakes is he going to make?

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rmoney's Political Statement re: Libya attack backfires (Original Post) pathansen Sep 2012 OP

Pretty acurrate discription of how it looks. Mitt: put up or concede. marble falls Sep 2012 #1

Commander in thief GarH Sep 2012 #2

First foreign policy mistake: encouraging involvement in Vietnam when he never served. freshwest Sep 2012 #3

marble falls

(57,395 posts)

1. Pretty acurrate discription of how it looks. Mitt: put up or concede.

Reply to pathansen (Original post)

Wed Sep 12, 2012, 09:13 PM

Sep 2012

GarH

(33 posts)

2. Commander in thief

Reply to pathansen (Original post)

Wed Sep 12, 2012, 10:48 PM

Sep 2012

He's not remotely qualified as commandeer in chief. Now commander in thief from the 99%, he is VERY qualified for that.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)

3. First foreign policy mistake: encouraging involvement in Vietnam when he never served.

Reply to pathansen (Original post)

Thu Sep 13, 2012, 12:08 AM

Sep 2012

I think it all goes downhill from there. Same with all the chickenhawks. He should have kept his mouth then. Clinton was put down for protesting the war in the UK where he was going to school. He didn't serve, but didn't want others to do it for him. His biggest critics didn't serve, and he's pushing for wars when he doesn't believe in them. He doesn't care about helping America, just his own bottom line. We can't have him in office.

Reply to this discussion