Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pearl Harbor? Gulf of Tonkin? Fort Sumter? In relation to Iran? Really? (Original Post) Celebration Sep 2012 OP
He forgot to mention 9-11! Nostradammit Sep 2012 #1
I noticed that, too. silverweb Sep 2012 #3
Sigh Bucky Sep 2012 #4
Whatever. silverweb Sep 2012 #5
Stunning. silverweb Sep 2012 #2
Celebration Diclotican Sep 2012 #6
I'm wondering whether he is actually a joke. He is so extreme that it is hard to believe that he JDPriestly Sep 2012 #7
unfortunately he isn't a joke Celebration Sep 2012 #9
Patrick Clawson is director of research at The Washington Institute cpwm17 Sep 2012 #10
Is this guy related to Ken? n/t malthaussen Sep 2012 #8

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
3. I noticed that, too.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 08:48 PM
Sep 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]To my mind, 9/11 certainly does belong on that list. LIHOP, at the very least.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
2. Stunning.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 08:47 PM
Sep 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]And he actually says he's "not advocating" this while advocating it.

Can social media get people on the alert for such machinations to counter the zombie neocons' attempts to start another war??



Diclotican

(5,095 posts)
6. Celebration
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 10:08 PM
Sep 2012

Celebration

But he do WANT a war - he doesn't condone it but by all ways, he want a war, and if you read between the lines, he call ut US to just make a reason for going to war - a Gulf of Kontin moment, where the US have to attack Iran... And then start a war, in the persian gulf, who would more than possible make a mess of the economy as it is and make the prise of oil sky rock up to unknown levels..

This type of persons need to be kept under surveillance, as they WILL make it possible, to make US going to war against Iran... In one way or another, they want to make sure to get into a shooting match with Iran.. Not that Iran is a superpower, but they do is able to make a lot of trouble for the US navy in the area - and to the ship traffic in general...

Diclotican

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
7. I'm wondering whether he is actually a joke. He is so extreme that it is hard to believe that he
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 11:41 PM
Sep 2012

isn't one of these pranksters who pretends to be something he is not.

Like the people who dress up like millionaires and make fun of the Tea Party rallies or the guys who hold press conferences for corporations, say embarrassing things in the name of the corporation but are really just ridiculing the corporation.

This guy is so extreme that I can hardly believe he is real. He may be. But if so, all I can say is, Wow. Are they being this blatant about what they do.

It is very possible that someone will pull some stunt to push Obama to go to war. I think he is ready for it.

Iran should move now to get serious about negotiations because this may be its last chance to avoid a huge disruption of its economy and many deaths. Why can't it just agree to allow inspections of its nuclear sites? It would be easy.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
10. Patrick Clawson is director of research at The Washington Institute
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 10:36 AM
Sep 2012

Iran does allow inspectors at its sites. All of its nuclear materials are accounted for by the IAEA. The US, through the UN Security Council, is playing games. The UN Security Council is completely separate from the IAEA. Iran is in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Non-existent WMD's are only an excuse to bully Iran. If not WMD's that don't exist, they would come up with some other excuse. The scum, which includes Patrick Clawson, have the own agenda. And it isn't peace.

http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/experts/view/clawson-patrick

Patrick Clawson is director of research at The Washington Institute, where he directs the Iran Security Initiative. Widely consulted as an analyst and media commentator, he has authored more than 150 articles about the Middle East and international economics and is the author or editor of eighteen books or studies on Iran.

Dr. Clawson appears frequently on television and radio, and has published op-ed articles in major newspapers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post. He has also testified before congressional committees more than twenty times and has served as an expert witness in more than thirty federal cases against Iran. Prior to joining The Washington Institute, he was a senior research professor at the National Defense University's Institute for National Strategic Studies, a senior economist at the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and a research scholar at the Foreign Policy Research Institute.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Pearl Harbor? Gulf of To...