Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lars77

(3,032 posts)
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:06 PM Nov 2012

In Tight Race, 11th Hour Voter ID Laws, Suppression Could Decide Ohio and Other Swing States



Visit http://www.democracynow.org for the complete transcript, additional reports on this topic, and more information. Watch the independent, global news hour live weekdays 8-9am ET.

With the presidential election just one day away, eleventh-hour Republican voter suppression could swing the critical battleground state of Ohio for GOP nominee Mitt Romney. On Friday, Ohio's Secretary of State Jon Husted issued a last-minute directive which could invalidate a large number of legal provisional ballots by placing the burden on the voter to correctly record the form of identification provided to election officials. Over the weekend, long lines were reported across the state as voters braved cold weather to line up for hours at the polls. Even longer lines were reported in Florida, where early voters waited for up to six hours to cast their ballot. We're joined from Cleveland by Ari Berman, contributing writer for The Nation magazine and author of "Herding Donkeys: The Fight to Rebuild the Democratic Party and Reshape American Politics."

Tune in to Democracy Now! for our upcoming Election Night broadcast on November 6: http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2012/10/10/expanding_the_debate_upcoming_dem...

To watch the entire weekday independent news hour, read the transcript, download the podcast, search our vast archive, or to find more information about Democracy Now! and Amy Goodman, visit http://www.democracynow.org.

FOLLOW DEMOCRACY NOW! ONLINE:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/democracynow
Twitter: @democracynow
Subscribe on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/democracynow
Listen on SoundCloud: http://www.soundcloud.com/democracynow
Daily Email News Digest: http://www.democracynow.org/subscribe

Please consider supporting independent media by making a donation to Democracy Now! today, visit http://www.democracynow.org/donate/YT
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Tight Race, 11th Hour Voter ID Laws, Suppression Could Decide Ohio and Other Swing States (Original Post) Lars77 Nov 2012 OP
I may be mistaken LittleHoodedMonk Nov 2012 #1
I do believe you're full of it HERVEPA Nov 2012 #2
Well I know LittleHoodedMonk Nov 2012 #3
Husted couldn't GET voter ID law in place, but he's using a "directive" & his POWER as Sec of State Tigress DEM Nov 2012 #4
I didn;t know that! LittleHoodedMonk Nov 2012 #5
I just went through training for the Ohio election for polling judges... rexcat Nov 2012 #6
Lots of old fashioned voter suppression-- fewer machines in Democratic districts and Rove's teams Overseas Nov 2012 #7
1. I may be mistaken
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:09 PM
Nov 2012

But I don't believe any new voter ID laws have been enacted that will come into effect for this election.

That of course doesn't rule out extra-legal voter suppression by the teabaggers.

3. Well I know
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:14 PM
Nov 2012

The one in Pennsylvania was delayed by court order. I think the nation committee of state governments (or something like that) has on their website a map of the United States by voter ID law. 90% of states have PROPOSED voter ID laws since 2009, but I'm almost certain that none are coming into effect in swing states in time to affect this election.

But like I said, there is still plenty of voter suppression to worry about as it is, because the right is DESPARATE.

Tigress DEM

(7,887 posts)
4. Husted couldn't GET voter ID law in place, but he's using a "directive" & his POWER as Sec of State
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:15 PM
Nov 2012

to cause confusion and invalidate provisional ballots.

It's very similar to something Ken Blackwell did in 2004. His office had sent out voter registration cards on 60 pound card stock so he made a "directive" that said all voter registrations had to be on 80 pound stock, invalidating even the cards his own office had sent out all year long and this was months before the election.

5. I didn;t know that!
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:19 PM
Nov 2012

Thats discouraging, But in spite of it all I still think we are going to win this. The GOPbaggers are desperate and won't pull this off.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
6. I just went through training for the Ohio election for polling judges...
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 11:30 PM
Nov 2012

and it is our understanding that we, as judges, are to make sure that voters go to the correct precincts to vote. If a voter has changed their address and is at the precinct where they currently reside they will be issued a provisional ballot along with a change of address form. Those ballots will be counted. If someone votes provisionally in a precinct they don't reside the ballot will probably not be counted. In Ohio you must vote in the precinct where you reside.

I have been a polling judge since 2004 in Ohio and we do everything we can to make sure the voters are in the correct precinct to vote, especially if it is a provisional ballot and the information on the outside envelope that holds the provisional ballot is correctly filled out. If they are not filled out correctly the ballot can be disputed but that has always been that way since I started working the elections.

A voter who votes provisionally should contact the County Board of Elections within 10 days to make sure their ballot will be counted and if there are issues find out how to correct the problem.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
7. Lots of old fashioned voter suppression-- fewer machines in Democratic districts and Rove's teams
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 01:37 AM
Nov 2012

positioned at the polls in Democratic districts to challenge voters to prove their identities, not really because there are big problems with voter fraud but mainly because it SLOWS DEMOCRATIC VOTING DOWN.

It amazes me that voting can be administered by the states and whichever party is in charge. Republican secretaries of state did similar things last time but this time they have amped things up-- trying to cut down early voting and add in as many voter ID laws as possible.

And even when those efforts failed, some online voter information sites still had notices telling voters to bring their IDs.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»In Tight Race, 11th Hour ...