The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsNYTimes: Cats Film coughed up nothing but hairballs
Tom Hoopers critically reviled Cats collapsed over the weekend, collecting $6.5 million at North American theaters after costing roughly $100 million to make, not including marketing expenses. At Hoopers request, Universal sent theaters a version of Cats with slight special effects improvements over the weekend. Ticket buyers gave Cats a C-plus grade in CinemaScore exit polls.
Sign up for the Watching Newsletter
Get recommendations on the best TV shows and films to stream and watch, delivered to your inbox.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/22/movies/star-wars-box-office.html
Eugene
(61,900 posts)Social media is abuzz with this.
msongs
(67,420 posts)xlnt
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)Did you know Taron Egerton recorded it all with Giles Martin, son of George Martin who produced the Beatles at Abby Rd? Incredible. They didn't have any other fantasy/musicals to emulate, and really worked through it by hand as they went. Beautiful, one-of-a-kind film. Took lots of risks that really made it feel like a love letter from Elton to his fans. (Elton produced from afar.)
mnhtnbb
(31,392 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 23, 2019, 05:50 AM - Edit history (1)
I have a theory why it was panned by critics.
Matriarchal society (not in the original stage musical where Old Deuteronomy is male). No guns. No car chases. No space shit. And no sex.
It's about empathy. The female who is broken and battered wins the big ticket. The males do not dominate and the bad guy is not likeable.
It's poetry, song, and dance.
Jennifer Hudson turns in a masterful, controlled performance that had me in tears.
It's not Disney. I loved it.
sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)mbusby
(823 posts)...the movie... not so much.