The DU Lounge

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts) Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:36 AM Sep 2012

Finally, the nude Kate Middleton Photos everyone has been looking for (NSFW)

Exclusive: The Bare Kate Middleton Photos Everyone’s Been Looking For
Sep. 15, 2012

An obscure French magazine has shocked Britian and the world by publishing bare, topless photographs of the U.K.'s Duchess of Cambridge - Kate Middleton. The move has sparked controversy and ignited a debate on celebrity expectations of privacy in the digital era.

Most people, however, haven't seen the nude photos in question since the magazine has refused to put them online in hopes of driving sales of its print edition.

For the purpose of informing the intellectual debate surrounding their publication, The Daily Currant has gained exclusive acceess to these naked photos and publishes them below.

So sit back and brace yourself. These are definitely NSFW folks:

http://dailycurrant.com/2012/09/15/exclusive-bare-kate-middleton-photos-everyones-2/

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Finally, the nude Kate Middleton Photos everyone has been looking for (NSFW) (Original Post) Major Nikon Sep 2012 OP

"informing the intellectual debate surrounding their publication" Ptah Sep 2012 #1

It's from the Daily Currant, HappyMe Sep 2012 #3

!!! HappyMe Sep 2012 #2

I really don'y know what all the fuss it about. Peni Sep 2012 #4

That's false advertising. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #5

Topless and bottomless photos Major Nikon Sep 2012 #6

FULL NUDITY - PORNOGRAPHY - SEX WITH VEGETABLES - You know, the usual tabloid stuff. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #7

Semi nude in private with husband sarge43 Sep 2012 #8

Dick Morris will be in his bunk Tom Ripley Sep 2012 #9

Shocking antiquie Sep 2012 #10

Obviously she's quite the hussy. mythology Sep 2012 #11

Ptah

(33,032 posts)

1. "informing the intellectual debate surrounding their publication"

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:41 AM

Sep 2012

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)

3. It's from the Daily Currant,

Reply to Ptah (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:51 AM

Sep 2012

which is comparable to The Onion.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)

2. !!!

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:43 AM

Sep 2012

Oh the humanity!

Peni

(2 posts)

4. I really don'y know what all the fuss it about.

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 11:54 AM

Sep 2012

Let's face it, she is not exactly well endowed. More of a Jamie Lee Curtis than a Pamela Anderson or Dolly Parton. The photographer must have had a colossal lens to photograph from a distance what little she has.

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

5. That's false advertising.

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:15 PM

Sep 2012

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)

6. Topless and bottomless photos

Reply to HopeHoops (Reply #5)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:43 PM

Sep 2012

What else do you want?

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

7. FULL NUDITY - PORNOGRAPHY - SEX WITH VEGETABLES - You know, the usual tabloid stuff.

Reply to Major Nikon (Reply #6)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:45 PM

Sep 2012

sarge43

(28,941 posts)

8. Semi nude in private with husband

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:31 PM

Sep 2012

Never before in human history has such an event taken place.

Tom Ripley

(4,945 posts)

9. Dick Morris will be in his bunk

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 01:11 AM

Sep 2012

antiquie

(4,299 posts)

10. Shocking

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 09:18 AM

Sep 2012

Another Wiki! The education one can get from The Lounge is amazing.

mythology

(9,527 posts)

11. Obviously she's quite the hussy.

Reply to Major Nikon (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 10:40 PM

Sep 2012

That said, I really can't see why people are all that excited to see her breasts. I'm sure they are lovely, but there are plenty of women on the internet more than happy to display said body part willingly. I don't need to violate somebody's privacy to see breasts.

Reply to this discussion