But, I have to agree about the conspicuous consumption.

I could live very well for at least 5 years on that kind of money. Must be nice to have that kind of money to piss away like that, just by the sheer fact that your father is famous.

That would really top off the episode.

...I guess that's the point. It's a $250,000 conversation piece.

...to have the same effect.

Not a dumb move really.

Pop singers are only as relevant as they appear.

I mean, does she have servants who wipe her booty?

It is known.

It's no more than I care what a poor person does with public assistance funds. I don't care about what rich people use with their money; I care about how rich people use their money. Rich people use their money to make more money, at least the ones who are smart. For that they are given an incredible advantage over anyone who gets their income from wages. That's why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

I wonder how many hungry Americans $250K would feed.

I thought this was going to be about Ann Romney.

How someone out there decided that Kelly Osborne is a style icon is beyond me. I think her taste is clothing and the judging of others is just ridiculous which I guess makes her the perfect replacement for when Joan Rivers kicks the bucket.

Just keep on. You might want to read a little history, though.

Like couture. The nail polish creator made one or two bottles of the crazy expensive stuff and many, many $25 bottles that are being advertized. They could make money on that publicity. As to crushed diamonds, they are the ultimate in recyclable material.

So I think the whole thing is spin.