The DU Lounge

rug

(82,333 posts) Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:24 PM Nov 2012

Does this bark make my ash look fat?

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does this bark make my ash look fat? (Original Post) rug Nov 2012 OP

Is that swamp ash? Erose999 Nov 2012 #1

Damned if I know but I bet now it feels worse. rug Nov 2012 #2

That's given me a woody. MiddleFingerMom Nov 2012 #3

Count your blessings. rug Nov 2012 #4

Jeez, no need to be so prickly! Ptah Nov 2012 #5

With a waist like that? No way. nt DCKit Nov 2012 #6

Better than Britney Spears forgetting her panties. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #7

Buns of oak. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #8

I hope that posterior doesn't get made into posts. marzipanni Nov 2012 #9

Erose999

(5,624 posts)

1. Is that swamp ash?

Reply to rug (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:28 PM

Nov 2012

rug

(82,333 posts)

2. Damned if I know but I bet now it feels worse.

Reply to Erose999 (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:29 PM

Nov 2012

MiddleFingerMom

(25,163 posts)

3. That's given me a woody.

Reply to rug (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:33 PM

Nov 2012

rug

(82,333 posts)

4. Count your blessings.

Reply to MiddleFingerMom (Reply #3)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:36 PM

Nov 2012

Ptah

(33,032 posts)

5. Jeez, no need to be so prickly!

Reply to rug (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:36 PM

Nov 2012

DCKit

(18,541 posts)

6. With a waist like that? No way. nt

Reply to rug (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:41 PM

Nov 2012

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

7. Better than Britney Spears forgetting her panties.

Reply to rug (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:32 PM

Nov 2012

rrneck

(17,671 posts)

8. Buns of oak. nt

Reply to rug (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 07:46 PM

Nov 2012

marzipanni

(6,011 posts)

9. I hope that posterior doesn't get made into posts.

Reply to rug (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 08:05 PM

Nov 2012

I hope that tree doesn't get spanked into planks.

I hope that butt doesn't get turned into bats.

The leaves, not that ass, pass the gas (you know, O)

Reply to this discussion