The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsWhy do women portray Peter Pan in theater productions?
I know it's somewhat of a tradition (Mary Martin then, Cathy Rigby now).
Since an argument can be made that it creates a certain sexual ambiguity, why doesn't it bring out howls of protests from Republicans? After all, they went apeshit over a purse-carrying purple teletubby.
Just curious what DUers think.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)no idea why peter pan is a female unless its to do with the youthful thing.
frogmarch
(12,156 posts)because most men, even small, lithe, youthful-looking men, have voices that would be too deep to be the voice of Peter Pan.
eShirl
(18,495 posts)assuming it's in production for a while
undeterred
(34,658 posts)and a male with gymnastic skills is a whole lot bulkier than a female.
nolabear
(41,987 posts)Ira Glass said it's the only time he's ever had to turn off his microphone because he was laughing so hard he was embarrassed. It's about a small town director who's version of Peter Pan goes terribly, terribly wrong.
I almost drove the car off the road the first time I listened to it.
Hey ! I found it! Treat yourself.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)successful enough to go on for a significant time.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)really didn't care if Timmy fell down the well. It was a feminist thing.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)My middle daughter was in the room (holding a cat, of course) when I lost it. I explained the posts and she knew about Timmy. She found it equally funny.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,205 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)She's larger than most males. Typically females only hit about 50 or so pounds. She clocked in at 77 at one point. We switched foods and she's back down in the 60's range (good weight for her), but she's just a beast for the breed. In sharp contrast, our sheltie was the runt and she's never been above 22 lbs. Sort of a Mutt and Jeff thing.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Females were too articulate for the role.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,761 posts)who wouldn't break the wires in the "flying" scenes.
mykpart
(3,879 posts)It's painful to males in places that females don't have.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)but I think it's mostly for the voice, but size is a plus.
Sure, there might be guys who could do it, but you're going to have far more women than men to choose from if you're just looking for people of a smaller size with a voice in a certain register.
I had some friends who were in my college production of it... can't remember who played Peter though - or if they were male or female. I'm pretty sure I was too interested in a girl who was one of the lost boys to notice.
sakabatou
(42,163 posts)LeftinOH
(5,355 posts)putting a real child through that is too much. Maybe a film version could do it, but not on the stage.
Kaleva
(36,315 posts)He's small, has the phsical skills and his voice could be dubbed over with that of recordings of Mary Martin's when she played the role.
merrily
(45,251 posts)It's easier to find a female with shoulders and height small enough to be a boy than it is to find a man. Also females voices do not change with puberty. And they don't get five o'clock shadow, though makeup could probably fix that.
You could put a boy in the role, but you would have to keep swapping him out with a new lead as he grew. And it is a pretty big role for a kid.