Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluesbassman

(19,374 posts)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:56 AM Dec 2012

Saw Django Unchained today. *Impression - No Spoilers*

Tarantino tends to be a love him or hate kind of a writer/director, but if you like his films, you'll love this one. Christoph Waltz and Jamie Foxx put in stellar performances, supporting cast was excellent. A bit long at 2hrs 45min, but the story and character development supports that length. A certain racial slur is prominently featured, but the story is set two years prior to the Civil War in the South so it's relevant. Very violent, but that's where a lot of the love him or hate him comes in with Tarantino.

One minor spoiler below:












































Bad news for those of you who look forward to Tarantino's trademark foot fetish feature, none in this flick.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Saw Django Unchained today. *Impression - No Spoilers* (Original Post) bluesbassman Dec 2012 OP
I loved this WilmywoodNCparalegal Dec 2012 #1
LOVE. littlemissmartypants Dec 2012 #2
His foot-fetishism in Reservoir Dogs really creeped me out. Orrex Dec 2012 #3

WilmywoodNCparalegal

(2,654 posts)
1. I loved this
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:25 AM
Dec 2012

I knew going in what QT movies are like (apparently, some critics did not know). I have loved most QT movies for a while and have grown to appreciate them more and more as time goes by.





*Possible spoilers below*

This one I liked on different fronts. It had some spaghetti western in it, it had some revenge motifs (see Kill Bill, Inglorious Basterds), it had humor, it had references to literature, it had references to an actual branch of 'science' that was popular in the 1800s (phrenology), it had the horrors of slavery, it had a lot of stuff in it.

I think people are so divorced with the notion of slavery and what it actually meant that some people were turned off by the way QT portrayed. Yes, people were indeed whipped, people were indeed put in boxes in the ground for days at a time, people were branded for trying to escape (if not worse, as some were actually hobbled and disabled), families were routinely broken apart, etc. All this stuff happened for real. The n-word is repeated often, but I think its use is justified by the time period and the circumstances - i.e., it's not gratuitously used.

Leonardo DiCaprio was fantastic. Jamie Foxx was great. Christoph Waltz was superb. All the cast was great. Sam Jackson was excellent. There were quite a few cameos by well known actors. Bruce Dern, Don Johnson, even Jonah Hill. The scene with (Spoiler) the posse wearing bags on their head - a KKK precursor - was hilarious.

Like many other QT movies, the soundtrack alone was intriguing. Various styles of music, from western movie motifs to rap to classical pieces to an original song written by Ennio Morricone (who wrote several soundtracks for spaghetti western), sung in Italian.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Saw Django Unchained toda...