Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsSo is a retired pope still infallible or is he always wrong like all other men?
This question is for all those who definitively know how many angels can sit on the head of a pin.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 758 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So is a retired pope still infallible or is he always wrong like all other men? (Original Post)
Jersey Devil
Feb 2013
OP
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)1. Well that title will go down well with the MRA's...
Not that I care that much.
SwissTony
(2,560 posts)2. Sorry, one of my pet peeves.
Almost all people assume that counting angels on a pin-head is a stupid, bourgeois argument. It's not and it wasn't.
Angels were assumed to have zero 'state' - what we call 'dimension' these days. Angels were regarded as infinitesimal. So the debate was about the nature of infinity and, therefore, the infinitesimal. It was couched in terms of angels because just about everything was couched in religious terms then.
My $0.02.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,748 posts)3. Even a stopped Pope is right twice a day.
Bake
(21,977 posts)4. Technically, he's only "infallible" when he speaks "ex cathedra"
Which isn't all time--seldom, in fact.
So he'll keep on being wrong after his resignation just like he has been so far!
Bake