The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsHow do they do it? Why is it that some actors can manage to draw tears, and others cannot?
The sign of a good actor, IMHO, is someone who can cry on cue. Some actors do it amazingly well, and some not at all. It does make a huge difference in selling their roles. I suspect that is what makes Jennifer Lawrence a stand out. She has a huge range of emotions that she can portray just using her facial muscles. i.e. the final scene in Catching Fire.
But if this is so critical to the craft, I wonder why there aren't ways to guarantee a good crying scene because a dry-eyed character who just lost someone important in their life just doesn't sell.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I didn't think they should have ended the movie that way, but that is a personal choice.
Baitball Blogger
(46,709 posts)But I agree with you. It reminded me of the Mel Gibson genre where an ordinary guy gets provoked and turns into an efficient killing machine. (Reminds me of a right-wing pipe dream)
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I don't have to like it though.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)and you can find an explanation right here:
http://www.backstage.com/advice-for-actors/professional-tips/what-is-sense-memory-and-how-should-you-use-it/
Doing it once a night onstage is one thing, doing it 5 times in an afternoon for the cameras is probably something exhausting.
The difference between good actors and great ones is held within the ability to completely use sense memory.....IMNSHO....
Chan790
(20,176 posts)I took a drama class a few years ago (not in some actor's studio...in a university drama department because it was worth doing right), thinking it would help me both as a writer and as someone who wants to work in a public-facing role in the NPO sector...I had to do a lot of method acting for the class including work in sense-memory and it's exhausting to make yourself cry repeatedly and draw up the entire range of emotions in a 1:25-long class twice a week. That's just the tip of the iceberg in terms of learning to be even a mediocre actor.
If someone really wants to learn to do it well, I recommend reading Acting: The First Six Lessons by Richard Boleslavsky. It's only 140 pages but it reads really slow even though it's written as a two-person stage-play of a series of conversations between an instructor and student.
http://www.amazon.com/Acting-First-Lessons-Richard-Boleslavsky/dp/1614274339/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1386273085&sr=1-1
Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)Groucho Marx IIRC
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)is one of the reasons why I would not get into a relationship with a really good actor.
How can anyone tell which emotions are real and which are not.
In a way (and IMO) it's almost like being in a relationship with a psychopath, who can feign emotions he doesn't really feel in order to manipulate another person.
Sort of creepy, really.
Baitball Blogger
(46,709 posts)mnhtnbb
(31,388 posts)I can tell you that it's all about losing yourself in the role.
It's something else, though, to have a scene where you want
to elicit sympathetic crying in the audience. I played
M'Lynn in a production of Steel Magnolias about 20 years ago.
I can still hear the sniffles from the audience in response
to M'Lynn's monologue about Shelby's last moments when they unhooked
her from the respirator and she died.
It starts with good writing.