Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 07:15 PM Jul 2014

Why Classic Rock Isn’t What It Used To Be

Led Zeppelin is classic rock. So are Mötley Crüe and Ozzy Osbourne. But what about U2 or Nirvana? As a child of the 1990s, I never doubted that any of these bands were classic rock, even though it may be shocking for many to hear. And then I heard Green Day’s “American Idiot” on a classic rock station a few weeks ago, and I was shocked.

It was my first time hearing a band I grew up with referred to as “classic rock.” Almost anyone who listens to music over a long enough period of time probably experiences this moment — my colleagues related some of their own, like hearing R.E.M. or Guns N’ Roses on a classic rock station — but it made me wonder, what precisely is classic rock? As it turns out, a massive amount of data collection and analysis, and some algorithms, go into figuring out the answer to that very question.

No one starts a band with the intention of becoming classic rock. It’s just sort of something that happens. Figuring out which genre a band fits into — is it techno or house? — has always been a tricky part of the music business. Identifying what’s classic rock is particularly challenging because it’s a constantly moving target, with very different kinds of music lumped together under the same banner. How the people who choose what music you hear — whether on the radio or an Internet streaming service — go about solving this problem reveals a deep connection between data and music.

To see what the current state of classic rock in the United States looks like, I monitored 25 classic rock radio stations1 operating in 30 of the country’s largest metropolitan areas for a week in June.2 The result, after some substantial data cleaning, was a list of 2,230 unique songs by 475 unique artists, with a total record of 37,665 coded song plays across the stations.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-classic-rock-isnt-what-it-used-to-be

You can stop this article at 'Led Zeppelin is classic rock.'

Fin.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Classic Rock Isn’t What It Used To Be (Original Post) onehandle Jul 2014 OP
Here, this'll help ... Scuba Jul 2014 #1
No, no, that's rock and roll. malthaussen Jul 2014 #3
Your last line is truth Boom Sound 416 Jul 2014 #2
It made me sad to realize how long Green Day has been around. LisaLynne Jul 2014 #4
One of my local "classic rock" stations has so watered down the definition of the term. Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2014 #5
That Kid Rock song really is the worst cemaphonic Jul 2014 #7
The really cruel thing about the Kid Rock song: Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2014 #11
I have no idea. Xyzse Jul 2014 #6
It Happens RobinA Jul 2014 #8
Hair Metal is Classic Rock? Iggo Jul 2014 #9
No one starts a (real) band... lame54 Jul 2014 #10
REM has never sold a song to a commercial and never will. Avalux Jul 2014 #14
You also have the problem that the mainstream rock scene has diminished over the past 10-15 years Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2014 #12
Ummm.....it's all in the age of the target audience. Avalux Jul 2014 #13
Classic = Old GOLGO 13 Jul 2014 #15

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,184 posts)
5. One of my local "classic rock" stations has so watered down the definition of the term.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 09:55 AM
Jul 2014

I've caught them playing Kid Rock. Kid fucking Rock. And not just any Kid Rock song, but that really horrible one where he shits all over both Warren Zevon's "Werewolves of London" and Lynyrd Skynrd's "Sweet Home Alabama" all at the same time. Which I believe is less than 10 years old.

I guess the thought process was that it somehow played homage to two actual classic rock songs, so it fit the genre. But I just can't see why they just don't play those songs which are infinitely better than the shitty Kid Rock song?

I've also heard plenty of U2, REM, Nirvana and Pearl Jam on the station. Which is fine. I've accepted that the rock music of my youth is now considered old and can fit into the classic rock genre. What drives me crazy, however, is that I think I've heard Smashing Pumpkins a grand total of once on that station. If 90s rock is now classic rock, how could you just dismiss the Pumpkins like that? Meanwhile, they'll play far lesser bands from that era like Bush multiple times.

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
7. That Kid Rock song really is the worst
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 02:15 AM
Jul 2014

Sampling can be done creatively, but just putting a classic riff on repeat and plopping your crappy song on top has never been cool.

Plus, if you really want to write a song about how much you love Lynyrd Skynrd, here's how you do it:



Good point about Smashing Pumpkins. I was never a fan, but they certainly huge and influential through the 90s. Maybe it's because Nirvana and Pearl Jam had a straightforward sound that deliberately evoked core mid-70s classic rock, while bands like the Pumpkins and Radiohead had more elaborate arrangements and more complex harmonies. (and of course, U2 and REMs catalog stretches back to the early 80s).

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,184 posts)
11. The really cruel thing about the Kid Rock song:
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 09:54 AM
Jul 2014

Its intro is literally just the exact same opening as the Zevon song. So you get all excited when you think you are going to hear "Werewolves of London", only for Kid Rock's shitty voice to come on singing about how he liked to listen to Sweet Home Alabama in growing up in Detroit. And your heart just sinks.

Ironically, this morning going to work on that very station, I heard "Sweet Home Alabama" immediately followed by "Werewolves of London", with nary a Kid Rock to be found in between. It's like someone at the station was reading my rant from yesterday.

I understand what you mean about bands like Smashing Pumpkins and Radiohead not translating to traditional classic rock radio. Astonishingly, I've heard their songs being played on Adult Contemporary. Granted, it was "1979" and "Fake Plastic Trees" respectively--not exactly the most hard core on their albums--but it was a welcome relief from Celine Dion.



Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
6. I have no idea.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:02 AM
Jul 2014

Still, any time I hear early 2000s songs played in Classic Rock stations, I just get shocked.

Even late 90s ones.

RobinA

(9,894 posts)
8. It Happens
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 08:50 AM
Jul 2014

to the best of us. Can't remember the precise moment, but when I started to have to tune to classic rock stations when I wanted to hear "my" music, I knew some ship had left the port. So I switched to classical music. That way I didn't have to face the fact that my college music was "old." Bach has been old since before I was born.

lame54

(35,295 posts)
10. No one starts a (real) band...
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 09:36 AM
Jul 2014

with the intention of putting a song into a commercial
Rock&Roll is about sticking it to the man
but every song can eventually be used to sell useless crap
it's depressing

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
14. REM has never sold a song to a commercial and never will.
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 05:44 PM
Jul 2014

I will love them forever for that; even though I lost interest in their music after Green.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,184 posts)
12. You also have the problem that the mainstream rock scene has diminished over the past 10-15 years
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 10:14 AM
Jul 2014

You have a few mainstream acts come up during those years that more or less fall under the rock category that I do enjoy...The Killers, Arcade Fire, and a handful of others. And you've had indie bands always on the periphery.

But rock music as a whole has almost vanished from the mainstream radio scene. The 2000s were just brutal to the industry. First you had the god awful NuMetal. Then came the whiny, unremarkable Emo Rock. None of those subgenres produced any bands remotely close to anything you'd want to consider classic or memorable.

So rock music as a tour de force essentially ended in the late 1990s.

Not so coincidentally, this coincides with the rise of MP3s and the digital download. Those were a death knell to the music album, and rock music--more than any other genre--relied on the idea of the album. Pop music and hip hop has survived because you have so many one hit wonder type of artists out there who can bank on a profitable single. But the rock band going into the studio to record an entire album has become something of an anacrohism.

It's very likely that classic rock as a genre will have a terminating point of the late 1990s.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
13. Ummm.....it's all in the age of the target audience.
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 05:39 PM
Jul 2014

For me, at my age, the likes of U2 and REM are not classic rock. I cringe when I hear South Central Rain in the grocery store. But someone a lot younger doesn't have the same perspective. The term classic rock is for marketers, and isn't dependent on the music itself.

GOLGO 13

(1,681 posts)
15. Classic = Old
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:45 PM
Jul 2014

Commercial rock music/musicians that's been out there for over 20+ years usually falls into that category. Bands like Priest/Maiden/Dio get the Classic Metal tag.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Why Classic Rock Isn’t Wh...