Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 12:35 AM Apr 2015

Not counting the mezzanine.




Mail Room Orienter: You punch in at 8:30 every morning, except you punch in at 7:30 following a business holiday, unless it's a Monday, then you punch in at 8 o'clock. Punch in late and they dock ya. Incoming articles get a voucher, outgoing articles provide a voucher. Move any article without a voucher and they dock ya. Letter size a green voucher, oversize a yellow voucher, parcel size a maroon voucher. Wrong color voucher and they dock ya! 6787049A/6. That is your employee number. It will not be repeated! Without your employee number you cannot get your paycheck. Inter-office mail is code 37, intra-office mail 37-3, outside mail is 3-37. Code it wrong and they dock ya! This has been your orientation. Is there anything you do not understand, is there anything you understand only partially? If you have not been fully oriented, you must file a complaint with personnel. File a faulty complaint ... and they dock ya!


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not counting the mezzanine. (Original Post) kentauros Apr 2015 OP
Bump and comment :) kentauros Apr 2015 #1
Somehow I get the impression that you're a person who may appreciate this story discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #2
So, is that like kentauros Apr 2015 #3
The DRD would absolutely work with a triple nested acronym discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #4
And then they dock ya! kentauros Apr 2015 #5
"What's the matter?" A HERETIC I AM Apr 2015 #6
Did that in software. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #7

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
1. Bump and comment :)
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 11:49 AM
Apr 2015

Upon having some recent viewings of this, I have pondered if the Coens twisted the colloquialism "It ain't over until the fat lady sings" by having a large lady scream at the demise of Waring Hudsucker. Probably. There's a vague reference to that idea in a book, The Brothers Coen: Unique Characters of Violence. I may have to find it and read it

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,481 posts)
2. Somehow I get the impression that you're a person who may appreciate this story
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 02:14 PM
Apr 2015

If not, sorry for boring you.

Some years ago I worked for a company that made avionics instruments. A lot of what I do is write requirements. Requirements in this sense are simply definitive statements written in English upon which to base a test which determines whether the product works as desired. After various team members became a bit mechanical in this writing and a bit of a humorous anomaly became apparent to me.

The unit I was working on incorporated 2 main functions: air data (like altitude, airspeed...) and attitude (essentially, which way is up). This box contained a microprocessor that ran the various checks, calculations and communications routines. Numerous built in tests (BIT) were part of the code. (Power-up BIT or PBIT, continuous/CBIT...) Part of many of the various tests included making a note of any failure in a special part of memory called the fault log.

Somewhere during development it was determined that a good test to add to PBIT would be a test to check the integrity of the fault log. Sure enough, some other genius, operating in rote semi-mechanical mode added a requirement to say that when a fault log fault was detected a record of the fault log should be added to the fault log.

I managed to point out the inherent wisdom missing in this line of thinking before the design review.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
3. So, is that like
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 09:28 PM
Apr 2015

The Department of Redundancy Department?

Reminds me, too, of the almost mythical "triple-nested acronym" according to friends that have worked for NASA contractors. That's an acronym made from acronyms composed of more acronyms

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,481 posts)
4. The DRD would absolutely work with a triple nested acronym
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 10:44 PM
Apr 2015

I never have. One of the more obscure SOWs (statements of work) was of the DTUPC type. (Design to unit price constraint)

I worked for a NASA contractor awhile back and quit after 6 weeks. The project manager was giving off these 'oh no they might cancel the project any minute' vibes. I think he was just a nervous/panic person but I wasn't interested in finding out.

Being a contractor is tiring.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,376 posts)
6. "What's the matter?"
Fri Apr 24, 2015, 01:46 AM
Apr 2015

"Something"
"Somethings the matter?"
"Yes"
"Well, what is the something that's the matter?"
"I can't say"
"Why?"
"Because something is the matter"


Have I got that about right?


FWIW, I was a Cessna FBO Parts Manager for a time in the 80's and had to deal with the old fashioned Avionics. Seems to me that conversation actually occurred!

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,481 posts)
7. Did that in software.
Fri Apr 24, 2015, 09:44 AM
Apr 2015

- Something's broke.
- What's broke?
- Not sure what else but for sure the thing that can tell me what's broke is broke.

< we need a scratch-head smiley >

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Not counting the mezzanin...