The DU Lounge

kentauros

(29,414 posts) Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:37 PM Mar 2012

This message was self-delicious for its author

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-delicious for its author (Original Post) kentauros Mar 2012 OP

This message was self-destructive for its author. pacalo Mar 2012 #1

Speaking from experience? kentauros Mar 2012 #2

I misread this the first time siligut Mar 2012 #3

You can misread it or unread it for all I kare kentauros Mar 2012 #4

I thought it was a self-deleted thread siligut Mar 2012 #5

I wanted to use "self-deleterious" kentauros Mar 2012 #6

This message was self licked for its author. madinmaryland Mar 2012 #7

You must be a cat, kentauros Mar 2012 #8

!!! MiddleFingerMom Mar 2012 #10

This message was self-deprecating for its author Dr. Strange Mar 2012 #9

It was self-depreciating for you as well. kentauros Mar 2012 #13

I am NOT gonna be the one to say "This message was self-defecating for its author"!!!!! MiddleFingerMom Mar 2012 #11

I dare you to post that one in GD! kentauros Mar 2012 #12

pacalo

(24,721 posts)

1. This message was self-destructive for its author.

Reply to kentauros (Original post)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:42 PM

Mar 2012

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

2. Speaking from experience?

Reply to pacalo (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:44 PM

Mar 2012

Poor, yet funny, turtle

siligut

(12,272 posts)

3. I misread this the first time

Reply to kentauros (Original post)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:47 PM

Mar 2012

Did you post this so it would be misread? Once it gets a reply, the ruse is up.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

4. You can misread it or unread it for all I kare

Reply to siligut (Reply #3)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:50 PM

Mar 2012

So, what illegibility did you see?

siligut

(12,272 posts)

5. I thought it was a self-deleted thread

Reply to kentauros (Reply #4)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:58 PM

Mar 2012

On first glance, that is what it appeared to be

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

6. I wanted to use "self-deleterious"

Reply to siligut (Reply #5)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:01 PM

Mar 2012

but it didn't quite work in the sentence

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)

7. This message was self licked for its author.

Reply to kentauros (Original post)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:35 PM

Mar 2012

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

8. You must be a cat,

Reply to madinmaryland (Reply #7)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:36 PM

Mar 2012

doing kitty yoga

MiddleFingerMom

(25,163 posts)

10. !!!

Reply to madinmaryland (Reply #7)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:49 PM

Mar 2012

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

Dr. Strange

(25,921 posts)

9. This message was self-deprecating for its author

Reply to kentauros (Original post)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:37 PM

Mar 2012

I suck that way.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

13. It was self-depreciating for you as well.

Reply to Dr. Strange (Reply #9)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:56 PM

Mar 2012

Stay away from the Antiques Roadshow.

MiddleFingerMom

(25,163 posts)

11. I am NOT gonna be the one to say "This message was self-defecating for its author"!!!!!

Reply to kentauros (Original post)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:50 PM

Mar 2012

.
.
.
Oops.
.
.
.
.
DAMMIT!!!
.
.
.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

12. I dare you to post that one in GD!

Reply to MiddleFingerMom (Reply #11)

Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:55 PM

Mar 2012

Or is it DG?

Reply to this discussion