On the ratio.

trying to be rational with us.

ETA:

I must add that I think you have crossed it.

? to go, with a cup of irrational coffee, thank you very much.

But the aftermath is bound to solve them, just as Hawking's has surmised. I think it has something to do with the line between the numerator and denominator eroding and us ending up with one party.

Seems you have crossed an imaginary point.

I think you'll find a perfect summation.

might think that their history dictates that they should be inclusive with electrons arguing in favor of your 'nonplussed' reference.

Figures....

______

Nite -- all these math 'exercises' has me heading to bed

I want one.

copy mine. right click on it and use the url

Last edited Sun Sep 6, 2015, 09:59 AM - Edit history (1)

I fear it would be too divisive.

I think you're appealing to the lowest common denominator among us. You're trying to feed us some pi-in-the-sky that's totally irrational and negative, and probably imaginary as well. And I think you're counting on a high factor of ignorance among us to prove your theorem. Well, the numbers just don't stack up the way you think they do.

where

[font size = 3]y = Liberty

z= Justice for all

T = Republicans, Tealiban, and assorted RWNJ

(y + z) / T = X

No class whatsoever.

If two vowels go walking, the numerator does the arithmetic