The DU Lounge

Swede

(33,282 posts) Thu Mar 22, 2012, 08:16 PM Mar 2012

I just got this in an email.

Highway accident near Ft McMurray Alberta. Warning,this is a bad one.

http://rmirror.net/r/videos/comments/q5hu9/car_accident_nsfl/

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I just got this in an email. (Original Post) Swede Mar 2012 OP

Holy fucking shit. EastTennesseeDem Mar 2012 #1

Oh my god! nt frogmarch Mar 2012 #2

Damn! ohiosmith Mar 2012 #3

Thanks for the warning. I wish I would've heeded it. savalez Mar 2012 #4

OMG! was it real? I mean DDDammnn! benld74 Mar 2012 #5

There should be concrete barriers between the opposing lanes. n/t Joe Shlabotnik Mar 2012 #6

Ft. McMurray is hell and gone. I'm surprised the road is paved. ohiosmith Mar 2012 #7

That looks very cgi to me. nolabear Mar 2012 #8

EastTennesseeDem

(2,675 posts)

1. Holy fucking shit.

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 08:18 PM

Mar 2012

That's awful!

frogmarch

(12,159 posts)

2. Oh my god! nt

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 08:22 PM

Mar 2012

ohiosmith

(24,262 posts)

3. Damn!

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 08:26 PM

Mar 2012

savalez

(3,517 posts)

4. Thanks for the warning. I wish I would've heeded it.

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 08:31 PM

Mar 2012

To others. It's a horrific car accident. Viewer discretion advised.

benld74

(9,909 posts)

5. OMG! was it real? I mean DDDammnn!

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 08:48 PM

Mar 2012

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)

6. There should be concrete barriers between the opposing lanes. n/t

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 09:31 PM

Mar 2012

ohiosmith

(24,262 posts)

7. Ft. McMurray is hell and gone. I'm surprised the road is paved.

Reply to Joe Shlabotnik (Reply #6)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 09:35 PM

Mar 2012

nolabear

(41,991 posts)

8. That looks very cgi to me.

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 11:21 PM

Mar 2012

Forgive me if I'm wrong.

Reply to this discussion