Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 04:31 AM Dec 2015

George Lucas Says He Sold ‘Star Wars’ to ‘White Slavers’

Shut the fuck up, George. Slavers? Really?

In an interview with Charlie Rose, George Lucas spoke about everything from his and Disney’s branching vision to the deal itself. Lucas, who has always been protective of his series and even refers to them as his “kids,” hasn’t been looking back well on the deal with Disney (via Collider).

“I sold them to the white slavers that takes these things, and…,” Lucas said before laughing and deciding it better not to finish.

http://news.yahoo.com/george-lucas-says-sold-star-wars-white-slavers-213813307.html
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Paladin

(28,262 posts)
2. Says the guy who came up with the whitest movie series in history.
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 10:05 AM
Dec 2015

The original flick had one "black" character in it, Darth Vader----and ultimately, even HE turned out be nice and white, inside. If Wagner were still around, he'd do an opera of it----that's how white it is.

Go back to the corner and keep counting your money, George.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
4. Not quite... I am quite the fan of Lando Calrissian
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 10:51 AM
Dec 2015

Still, I do take your point and I can't agree with George at this time.

The new movie was done well, and was entertaining, which is far better than what he has come up with as his directing style seems to be stuck in the 70s.

Paladin

(28,262 posts)
5. Lando's that exception that proves the rule.
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 11:34 AM
Dec 2015

Haven't seen the new movie, will probably wait until it turns up on TV.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
6. It was done well.
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 11:40 AM
Dec 2015

I like the new characters, and unlike the last trilogy, the acting is not wooden.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
3. For $4 billion, I'd smile and shut the hell up George
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 10:43 AM
Dec 2015

He's just mad this last one is watchable, strike that, good.

Mesa thinks hesa mad about Jar Jar bombing

LostOne4Ever

(9,289 posts)
7. George Lucas no longer having any control over the franchise
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 11:44 AM
Dec 2015

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]Is the single greatest thing that could have ever happened to the series.[/font]

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
8. Says the man who got even richer because of Disney
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 12:18 PM
Dec 2015

If he wanted more or full creative control, he shouldn't have sold it. That was not a good moment of yours, Mr. Lucas.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
9. The new movie was entertaining and fun
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 12:41 PM
Dec 2015

and had no Jar-Jar Binks.

I rather enjoyed the prequels except for Jar-Jar and the overly long pod race. And midichlorians. I saw them as children's movies.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
11. As bad as Jar-Jar
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 01:53 PM
Dec 2015

The Force was better as a mystery. This made it a "how much horsepower can be measured on the dynamo-meter" question. It broke the suspension of disbelief. Even Lucas, especially Lucas, should have known this.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
13. I thought it smacked of elitism.
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 02:04 PM
Dec 2015

The force isn't something that is out there for everyone--it's just for the select few.

Which is why I hope that Rey isn't....well, you know. (Do I still need to worry about spoilers?)

Response to hedgehog (Reply #10)

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
12. Fuck off George--Midichlorians and Jar Jar show you were no longer capable.
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 02:03 PM
Dec 2015

Disney gave you 4 BILLIONS DOLLARS so you would go away. Just do that.

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
16. I didn't watch that whole interview, but I did see some timestamps to some other choice bits.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:36 PM
Jan 2016

At one point, he delivered a mini-lecture about how "some" directors went overboard with CGI and special effects, and lost track of the story. How can he be so lacking in self-awareness?

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
17. Reason number 1,367 why he had no business being involved any longer
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:37 PM
Jan 2016

Granted I'm a bad geek and didn't really care for the first trilogy as I found the characters very flat, but even in the first trilogy the ewoks prove that he was both lazy in regards to the story as they are really just short wookies with the name reversed that were designed to sell toys rather than adding to the story in any meaningful way.

And the second trilogy was just amazingly bad.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
18. Right...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 08:06 PM
Jan 2016

Lucas had originally planned for Endor to be the Wookie home world but that he figured he would make a killing selling Ewok merchandise. The "official" (Greedo shot first) explanation is that he wanted a world with stone age level technology and that Wookies (Chewbacca at least) were shown to be adept with technology.

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
20. The fun part was to see Charlie Rose, when he explained the Soviet film makers had more freedoms
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:59 PM
Jan 2016

The full interview below

This is where we get into some rather insightful commentary by the director about what it’s like working in the studio system as a filmmaker, making it clear as to why he doesn’t want to do what the studios want him to do anymore. Thinking back to the times when the Soviet Union was a more prominent threat and headline-maker, Lucas said that when he was prompted to express his pleasure at being in America where they had all the freedom in the world, he responded:

I know a lot of Russian filmmakers. They have a lot more freedom than I have. All they have to do is be careful about criticizing the government. Otherwise they can do anything they want.

And when it comes to the Hollywood system, both back then and today, Lucas says, “You have to adhere to a very narrow line of commercialism.” And to show how dangerous that can be, with studios just wanting sequels, remakes and more, he reminds us:

http://www.slashfilm.com/george-lucas-charlie-rose-interview/
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»George Lucas Says He Sold...