The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsSuspiria. What am I missing.
I made a serious effort to watch this universally praised film, and I found it so boringly unwatchable that I concluded that I'd been pranked.
Its much-lauded visuals look like cutting room floor outtakes from one of Stevie Nicks' lesser 80s videos, and the plot is so lifeless that it almost qualifies as a snuff film about killing film.
What's all the commotion about this dry, plodding waste of 100 minutes?
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)and had the same reaction.
It's possible that you have to watch it on acid to get the full effect.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)It's simply not your taste. That's not a bad thing, of course. It also suggests you should probably avoid all the so-called 'Giallo' Italian horror films, since Suspiria is pretty much the apex of that genre.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,202 posts)you've seen them all, at least the ones I saw - Deep Red, Suspiria and The Bird with Crystal Plumage. The all have a "now you see it, now you don't" scene that is just memorable enough that when they go back to it later you go "ah". Those are the only ones I saw. Are they all that way?
Orrex
(63,216 posts)I want to underscore that I really did watch it with an open mind, rather than going in with a "this will probably suck" attitude. But when it was done I wondered why I'd never seen it on MST3K.
But then I checked the Wiki page and was stunned to learn that it's so highly regarded. I felt like I'd missed a punchline or something.
Suffice it to say that the film's charms are lost on me, though I recognize that I'm a tiny minority in this regard.
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)is there have been four decades of filmmakers that have drawn from Argento, and those inspired by him, and those inspired by them, etc., so that anything that was new, daring, and inventive back in 1977 has been filtered into the movie-watchers expectations of horror, and thus seems stale and hackneyed.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)Also I just noticed (remembered?) that Suspiria came out in 1977, whereas I would have guessed '83 or '84, by which time such visuals were laughably commonplace.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)in which he simply gave a list (as an Appendix) of what his favorites were. Thus, it became legendary when it deserved to be forgotten, really. His taste in arts is as bad as his contemporary books.
I DO like other Dario Argento films, such as Deep Red.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,202 posts)It's half autobiography and half advice on becoming a writer, finding your style, etc.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)And I've read some of his other books, and The Shining is one of my all-time favorites, but weirdly, I find his recommendations (books and films) to be unreliable. Who knows.
Cheers.
skypilot
(8,854 posts)I think I was about 12 years old and living in North Philly when Suspiria first came out. I was kinda blown away by it. The first 20 minutes or so was like sensory overload for me with all that nonstop music, bold colors and patterns--and then the violence. But even back then I still preferred the beginning and the end of the movie. Thought it definitely dragged in the middle. Overall I'm not really a fan of Argento at all but Suspiria left an impression.