Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,963 posts)
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:56 AM May 2016

Review: 'Captain America: Civil War' sets standard for superhero team-ups

Still, after a stretch where superhero movies have produced headache-inducing sequences with almost abusive computer-generated imagery, "Civil War" maintains a sense of humanity. The fights are fast, frenetic, and crowd-pleasing, but mostly avoid the trap of becoming hollow animated constructs. In that, the Russo brothers seldom lose sight of the fact it should feel like there are people underneath those masks and armor.

Nor should the movie's sheer scope be taken for granted. This marks a significant departure from the genre's past, even as recently as a few years ago. In those days, lone crusaders would usually be introduced -- complete with origin story -- and battle a single threat. Superheroes were James Bond, just with a more garish wardrobe.

What's changed? Special effects have obviously made the spectacle of multiple characters feasible. Growing international box office has also emboldened studios by increasing the likelihood that they'll see a return on these massive investments of $200 million or more on production.

While the idea of a DC-Marvel rivalry has been overstated -- as in the comics, there's room for both -- the former hurried the process in "Batman v Superman," while Marvel assiduously built up to it. The result is a film that honors its comic-book origins while feeling like a massive spectacle. Moreover, "Civil War" touches on darker thematic elements without becoming grim or weighted down by the density of its mythology.

Simply put, when it comes to juggling multiple superheroes in a single movie, Marvel's latest comes close to setting the standard. And the studio, as well as the villagers, should have cause to rejoice.


http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/05/media/captain-america-civil-war-review/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Review: 'Captain America: Civil War' sets standard for superhero team-ups (Original Post) RandySF May 2016 OP
I'm hoping to see it this weekend NewJeffCT May 2016 #1
As an MCU fan from the beginning I have really high expectations for this one. Initech May 2016 #2
When I grew up reading comic books NewJeffCT May 2016 #3
My biggest beef with Batman V Superman was the complete lack of humor. Initech May 2016 #4
Marvels success is owed to Stan Lee's "every-man" focus. GOLGO 13 May 2016 #5
Batman isn't flawed? RandySF May 2016 #6
I'd say he's more paranoid with serious trust issues. GOLGO 13 May 2016 #7

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
1. I'm hoping to see it this weekend
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:55 AM
May 2016

The first Avengers movie was the first time I thought a movie with several superheroes/villains in it actually worked - usually, once a movie packs in more than just the main hero (Spider-Man 3, Batman Forever, etc)

I'm hoping this will be another one.

Initech

(100,087 posts)
2. As an MCU fan from the beginning I have really high expectations for this one.
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:14 PM
May 2016

Avengers: Age of Ultron was great even though some saw it as overwhelming. But it's funny how everything Marvel gets right, DC gets wrong. The Avengers is how you do a giant franchise flick. Batman vs Superman? Not how you do a giant franchise flick.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
3. When I grew up reading comic books
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:09 PM
May 2016

I tended to like The Fantastic Four and the X-Men over The Avengers, though Spider-Man was always may favorite. I like that the Marvel movies have big events and serious issues, but they have characters that can still maintain their humor & personality in the face of it all (that's partly why I loved Spidey - he always had a ready quip, no matter how dire the situation). Batman v Superman was just so grim - only Alfred brought a breath of fresh air, and maybe a tiny bit from Wonder Woman, but only as a contrast to Superman and Batman.

Initech

(100,087 posts)
4. My biggest beef with Batman V Superman was the complete lack of humor.
Fri May 6, 2016, 10:02 PM
May 2016

Which is why I love the Marvel flicks because they have humor. Even the Nolan Batman movies had humor in them for as dark and gritty as they were. And that's also the reason why I love Deadpool - it shows that an R rated superhero comedy could be done, and it was brilliantly executed.

As far as Alfred goes I tried to like Jeremy Irons but it's so hard to top the great Michael Caine that I kind of lost interest.

GOLGO 13

(1,681 posts)
5. Marvels success is owed to Stan Lee's "every-man" focus.
Sun May 8, 2016, 03:51 PM
May 2016

Meanwhile, DC focused on mostly heroic flawless characters. Batman is fabulously rich, handsome & is one of the brilliant minds in all of DC. Superman, a man with god-like powers is a perfect, humble, white-bread protector. Wonder Woman is beautiful, powerful & a member of a fabled warrior race.

Spiderman the orphan that can barely pay the rent on his tiny NYC apartment. J. Jonah Jameson torments him relentlessly as both PP/Spiderman.

The other members of the FF get fabulous powers while Ben Grim becomes a sullen, hideous monstrous THING.

Dr. Banner, one of the most brilliant minds is unable to stop his anger from transforming him into a near-mindless rampaging HULK.

Dr. Pym - wife beater, Tony Stark - alcoholic, Punisher - damaged as fuck and it goes on & on. Marvel is just packed with damaged, flawed & more interesting characters.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Review: 'Captain America:...