Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 02:01 PM Feb 2012

Shame on the Rich

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/02/shame-on-the-rich.html?ref=hp



<snip>

To see whether dishonesty varies with social class, psychologist Paul Piff of the University of California, Berkeley, and colleagues devised a series of tests, working with groups of 100 to 200 Berkeley undergraduates or adults recruited online. Subjects completed a standard gauge of their social status, placing an X on one of 10 rungs of a ladder representing their income, education, and how much respect their jobs might command compared with other Americans.

The team's findings suggest that privilege promotes dishonesty. For example, upper-class subjects were more likely to cheat. After five apparently random rolls of a computerized die for a chance to win an online gift certificate, three times as many upper-class players reported totals higher than 12—even though, unbeknownst to them, the game was rigged so that 12 was the highest possible score.

When participants were manipulated into thinking of themselves as belonging to a higher class than they did, the poorer ones, too, began to behave unethically. In one test, subjects were asked to compare themselves with people at the top or the bottom of the social scale (Donald Trump or a homeless person, for example.) They were then permitted to take candies from a jar ostensibly meant for a group of children in a nearby lab. Subjects whose role-playing raised their status in their own eyes took twice as many candies as those who compared themselves to "The Donald," the team reports online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In another test, participants were asked to list several benefits of greed; they were given the example that greed can help further one's professional goals, then asked to come up with three additional benefits. Again, lower-class subjects whose attitudes toward greed had been nudged in this way became just as likely as their wealthier counterparts to sympathize with dishonest behavior (taking home office supplies, laying off employees while increasing their own bonuses, overcharging customers to drive up profits).

<snip>




Although this article might prompt some of us to go "duh", I think it is interesting to note that the study seems to show that greed isn't necessarily the natural state of "human nature" but is exacerbated and rewarded by a perceived change in status. Capitalists often argue that capitalism is teh only system that can keep our "natural" rapaciousness in check with some kind of punishment/reward structure that it presumably has. This study seems to argue quite the opposite, that being rewarded for unethical behavior leads to more anti-social behavior. I'm curious what other people's take on this is.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
1. "this study seems to argue quite the opposite"
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 02:57 PM
Feb 2012

I agree with that. It's like someone who gets away with bad behavior and continues to do so because they are reaping the benefits. Why would they stop?? Capitalism seems to foster the most anti-social society around, imo.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
2. While I think this interesting, I have a problem with these studies.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 04:07 PM
Feb 2012

It still blames the people and not the system. Not all capitalists are bad, but their system is. Bill Gates isn't a selfish man or else he wouldn't be giving billions to charity, but Microsoft still exploits people. We need to change the system and then the selfish assholes will just be annoying and not a threat to humanity's survival.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
3. That's a good point too.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:53 PM
Feb 2012

This study would have very narrow application. I have a mental tic about the whole "human nature" meme of pro-capitalist discussions. It always seems to come up, and Marx, Engels, etc. account for that in their writing, but it can be tough to explain. It's the system that rewards the behavior, not the behavior that creates the system.

But so few people are rewarded under capitalism, I can't fathom how people can believe that it is our collective bad natures that keep perpetuating capitalism. Or that capitalism somehow reins in our "evil" human nature, free markets "create peace", etc. But people keep saying that it does. You know what I mean?

txlibdem

(6,183 posts)
13. As I recall, Bill Gates never gave much to charity before he retired
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 08:09 PM
Mar 2012

He was roundly criticized as being the richest man but giving only miniscule amounts to charity during the 1990s. Am I remembering incorrectly?

Well, he has always given more than Steve Jobs anyway so there's that.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
4. I believe that wealth and (according to this study), even..........
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 08:42 PM
Feb 2012

the PERCEPTION of wealth, creates an "entitlement" attitude. That's why they don't have any problems with dishonesty. They feel "entitled" to what they steal. It's SO ironic that the RW flames an "entitlement attitude" when it comes to the poor and working class, yet this study suggests that the real entitlement attitude is shown by the haves rather than the have nots.

And yes, to sing with the choir here, it's the system that encourages this "entitled" attitude. I've said all along that BECAUSE of the system, the capitalists can't even help themselves. You can't be ethical and be a capitalist. Or at least a good capitalist. All it takes is ONE capitalist to gain an advantage in the market by cheating (whether it's legal cheating or illegal) and they ALL will have to do it or be left behind. You can't rely on "conscious" or "ethical" capitalism because being conscious and ethical is a losing position in the capitalist system.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
5. And the group that has the most advantage keeps contracting in size.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 10:29 PM
Feb 2012

Back in the day, it was the 5% against the 95%. Now it's the 1%. Does it have to get down to .01% before we finally say "enough"?

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
6. yeah our economic system encourages selfishness.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 11:31 PM
Feb 2012

People are kind of like this emoticon: Everybody has got a good side and a greedy bastard inside. A better economic system that didn't encourage selfishness could lead to more overall happiness. Be careful though, it is the perception of one's own power and superior status that corrupts, not only economic class. That applies to anyone in a position of power and status over others. That could be a corporate CEO, or it could also be a government functionary.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
7. It might just be me, but I'm definitely more grudgy against our current economic ruling class.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 12:09 AM
Mar 2012

I mean, they make it so easy! I just found this right before I saw your reply. This story is from *today*. Check this out!: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/bonus-withdrawal-puts-bankers-malaise-050100338.html

Bonus Withdrawal Puts Bankers in "Malaise"



Schiff, 46, is facing another kind of jam this year: Paid a lower bonus, he said the $350,000 he earns, enough to put him in the country's top 1 percent by income, doesn't cover his family's private-school tuition, a Kent, Connecticut, summer rental and the upgrade they would like from their 1,200-square- foot Brooklyn duplex.

"I feel stuck," Schiff said. "The New York that I wanted to have is still just beyond my reach."

The smaller bonus checks that hit accounts across the financial-services industry this month are making it difficult to maintain the lifestyles that Wall Street workers expect, according to interviews with bankers and their accountants, therapists, advisers and headhunters.

"People who don't have money don't understand the stress," said Alan Dlugash, a partner at accounting firm Marks Paneth & Shron LLP in New York who specializes in financial planning for the wealthy. "Could you imagine what it's like to say I got three kids in private school, I have to think about pulling them out? How do you do that?"




I guess at this point I'd rather take my chances with a socialist government leader, than the system that props up the poor soul who has to cry in the lap of his therapist that his Wall Street lifestyle is not living up to his expectations.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
8. "People who don't have money don't understand the stress"
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:01 AM
Mar 2012

Wow. That was nuts.

It's like they live on a different planet or something. They seem kind of delusional. These people make way too much money considering that they contribute nothing of value to society.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
9. Here's another one:
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:37 AM
Mar 2012

I shouldn't collect these, they just make my class antagonism flare up.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/wealthy-woman-abuses-maid-658213

Feds Arrest Mansion Dweller In Servant Case
Illegal alien slept in closet, was paid .85/hour, complaint alleges



FEBRUARY 29--A New York woman who lives in a 34-room, 30,000-square-foot mansion is facing a federal criminal charge related to her employment of an illegal alien who allegedly served as a domestic servant in a “forced labor situation” that included her working 17-hour days, seven days a week, and sleeping in a walk-in closet.

Acting on a tip received by the National Human Trafficking Resource Center, federal immigration agents last year removed the servant from the 12-acre estate (pictured below) on the Mohawk River in Rexford, a hamlet 20 miles north of Albany.

A subsequent criminal investigation determined that the woman--who barely spoke English and came from the Kerala state in India--was paid about 85 cents an hour during the 67 months she worked for Annie George and her husband (who died in a plane crash in mid-2009).

<snip>

The George estate has a helicopter pad, an indoor swimming pool, 15 fireplaces, Scandinavian marble flooring, a four-story solarium, 24-karat gold gilded ceilings, a glass elevator, and an array of other features. Before his death, George’s husband listed the residence for sale at $30 million.






They do seem like they live on a different planet. Sadly they do live on our planet.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
10. Seriously, quit posting these lol.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:39 AM
Mar 2012

I'm normally a very kind person and hate violence, but god these people are making me sympathize with Robespierre.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
11. If I have to suffer, you all have to suffer with me.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 02:31 AM
Mar 2012


I get furious too. Reading the Manifesto usually puts me back in a better frame of mind. Knowing that all of this isn't random, or 'nature' or destined to hang around forever is calming. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm



Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other — Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.



In a perverse way, I suppose we are lucky that there are examples all around us these days, to point up that the class war is still very much alive. It seems to be getting much more simplified too.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
12. Oh, but I'm sure some apologist will point out that the closet........
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 11:20 AM
Mar 2012

was a "walk-in". And more room than she had in India. Wait for it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Shame on the Rich