Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 01:37 AM Mar 2012

Michael Parenti

He's passionate, compassionate, easy to understand and has a good sense of humor. Thought I'd start a thread with some videos of him for those who are interested in getting points to discuss with others offline. He's been on Democracy Now! and a number of other venues.

January-6-2012-Democracy and the Pathology of Wealth


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michael Parenti (Original Post) freshwest Mar 2012 OP
I've always believed this to be something people need to consider when dealing with the oligarches: freshwest Mar 2012 #1
And this needs to be brought up to people, as well: freshwest Mar 2012 #2
Michael Parenti my favorite political author NAO Mar 2012 #3
Parenti rocks. Starry Messenger Mar 2012 #4
That section about the ruling class......... socialist_n_TN Mar 2012 #5
I think about this a lot too. Starry Messenger Mar 2012 #6
That surprises me. white_wolf Mar 2012 #7
No Kucinich isn't, but my boss was. Starry Messenger Mar 2012 #9
Well, traditional liberals are part of the capitalist system......... socialist_n_TN Mar 2012 #8

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
1. I've always believed this to be something people need to consider when dealing with the oligarches:
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 01:39 AM
Mar 2012
Is Bush A Failure?


NAO

(3,425 posts)
3. Michael Parenti my favorite political author
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 02:27 AM
Mar 2012

his books are very easy to read and his ideas are intensely radical and they make sense of the "big picture".

I recommend "The Money Power", "Against Empire", and "Hidden Truths" are excellent. If you really want your mind blown, read "Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism"

Some of his writings are available free on his website: http://www.michaelparenti.org/

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
4. Parenti rocks.
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:22 PM
Mar 2012
ANYTHING BUT CLASS: AVOIDING THE C-WORD



"Class" is a concept that is strenuously avoided by both main­stream writers and many on the Left. When certain words are elimi­nated from public discourse, so are certain thoughts. Dissident ideas become all the more difficult to express when there are no words to express them. "Class" is usually dismissed as an outworn Marxist notion with no relevance to contemporary society. It is a five-letter word that is treated like a dirty four-letter one.

With the C-word out of the way, it is then easy to dispose of other politically unacceptable concepts such as class privilege, class power, class exploitation, class interest, and class struggle. These too are judged no longer relevant, if ever they were, in a society that sup­posedly consists of the fluid pluralistic interplay of diverse groups.

The Class Denial of Class

Those who occupy the higher circles of wealth and power are keenly aware of their own interests. While they sometimes seriously differ among themselves on specific issues, they exhibit an impressive cohesion when it comes to protecting the existing class system of corporate power, property, privilege, and profit.

At the same time, they are careful to discourage public awareness of the class power they wield. They avoid the C-word, especially when used in reference to themselves as in "owning class," "upper class," or "moneyed class." And they like it least when the politically active elements of the owning class are called the "ruling class."

The ruling class in this country has labored long to leave the impression that it does not exist, does not own the lion's share of just about everything, and does not exercise a vastly disproportionate influence over the affairs of the nation. Such precautions are them­selves symptomatic of an acute awareness of class interests.



More more more at the link. So good. Thank you for the thread, freshwest.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
5. That section about the ruling class.........
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:45 PM
Mar 2012

laboring long to leave the impression that it doesn't exist, ties into another post in GD that I've been thinking about tonight. The one about southerners thinking that "liberals" think of themselves as elite and look down their noses at them.

My thoughts on this were that there are "elites" like the redneck group thinks of and then there are the REAL elites, the owners, that nobody thinks of because they're not in the public eye very much. The stereotype of the academic, latte, liberal is there because they are the ones that these poor white rednecks actually see at times. Usually on Faux Noise. But the REAL elites are never seen by any of us proles.

When I think of "elites" I don't think of the academic liberal. That's not elite, not even if they THINK they're one of the elite. The real elites are the ones that try to OWN the rest of us.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
6. I think about this a lot too.
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 01:03 PM
Mar 2012

I live in Silicon Valley, which is heavy with overbearingly wealthy people. People out here seem to consider them slightly upscale neighbors. They will bash on Mitt Romney, but ignore the fact that our deficit here in CA could be fixed with higher taxes on 85 people who certainly don't consider the rest of us their "neighbors". I guess it just takes a massive amount of cognitive dissonance to exist with the enforced income disparity in the US.

I could be wrong though. The proposed initiative The Millionaires tax had an approval rating up in the 60% range last I checked.

There are some latte liberals that can be henchmen for capitalism, so I can kind of sympathize with the rednecks. I had a boss who was a Kucininch fan who was one of the worst people I ever worked for.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
7. That surprises me.
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 09:28 PM
Mar 2012

Kucinich doesn't strike me as latte liberal, he seems closer to a social-democrat. He isn't a Marxist, but he does seem to be on the side of the working class or at least wants to be, but really doesn't know how to be or maybe I'm just being tricked...

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
9. No Kucinich isn't, but my boss was.
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 04:44 PM
Mar 2012

The boss talked a good game, is what I meant. He would hold up his support for K and how he was down with the workers and then do bad anti-worker things. I could write a book. He was eventually forced to resign when it was found that he'd basically embezzled his salary and a consultant fee for his wife and done absolutely none of his job of raising money for the organization. He was good at being shitty to the rest of us who worked there though. Whenever I hear/read latte liberal, I think of him.

This shouldn't take away from socialist_n_TN's point that most of them are just guard dogs for the big ruling class. They are annoying, but aren't the main threat. I just have a mental tic about some progressives-in-name-only folks.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
8. Well, traditional liberals are part of the capitalist system.........
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 10:12 PM
Mar 2012

and I agree with you that a lot of times they don't relate well to the actual/traditional working class. And there are some with an "elitist" attitude. But as I said, I don't really consider them "elite". Most of them are just working class with easier and possibly more prestigeous jobs. If they REALLY think they're "elite", they're just fooling themselves.

As to "liberals" in general, I think that SDS summed it up pretty well in the Sixties. The fascists will shoot you. The conservatives will cheer them on. The moderates will watch your execution on TV. And the liberals will cry over your grave. In the dark after they've turned you in to the fascists. Or something like that. I don't trust them very far. When it comes to a choice between the current system and starting anew, they will INEVITABLY choose the current system.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Michael Parenti