Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,656 posts)
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 10:16 AM Oct 2014

Washington Post announces cuts to employees’ retirement benefits


X post in Labor

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/washington-post-announces-cuts-to-employees-retirement-benefits/2014/09/23/f485981a-436d-11e4-b437-1a7368204804_story.html




The newspaper said in a letter to employees that it was making the cuts in benefits “with a goal of better positioning The Post for long-term success.” (Win Mcnamee/Getty Images)


By Steven Mufson September 23

The Washington Post announced large cuts in retirement benefits on Tuesday, declaring that it would eliminate future retirement medical benefits and freeze defined-benefit pensions for nonunion employees.

The company also said that in negotiations that started Tuesday, it will seek to impose the same conditions on employees covered by the union — one of the first indications of how The Post’s new owner, Amazon.com founder Jeffrey P. Bezos, will manage relations with the staff of the news organization.

The changes will hit hardest at employees hired before 2009 who could plan on receiving pension payments based on their income and years of service. Each of those employees could see scores — or hundreds — of thousands of dollars less over the course of a retirement. More recent hires do not have traditional pension plans.

The Post will create a new cash balance plan to replace the pensions for nonunion employees and a separate but similar plan for those covered by the union. Those plans provide employees with a lump sum or annuity when they retire. But they do not guarantee a particular level of retirement payments, thus reducing the risk that Bezos would have to add money to the pension if financial markets plunged.

FULL story at link.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Washington Post announces cuts to employees’ retirement benefits (Original Post) Omaha Steve Oct 2014 OP
Amazon again. And yet everyone still complains about Wal-Mart... TreasonousBastard Oct 2014 #1
...“with a goal of better positioning The Post for long-term success.” KansDem Oct 2014 #2
Where is government oversight? yallerdawg Oct 2014 #3
K & R ctsnowman Oct 2014 #4
My boss is doing that, too. rogerashton Oct 2014 #5

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. Amazon again. And yet everyone still complains about Wal-Mart...
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 10:30 AM
Oct 2014

as if Wal-Mart is taking over the world.

Amazon now owns you. Any small part of you it might not own, it will get soon enough.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
2. ...“with a goal of better positioning The Post for long-term success.”
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 10:38 AM
Oct 2014
The newspaper said in a letter to employees that it was doing this “with a goal of better positioning The Post for long-term success.” The company declined to comment further.

“Sadly, rather than cutting costs by sharing them, some companies instead are giving up on providing pensions at all and dumping the responsibility and risk on employees, who are least prepared to handle it,” said Josh Gotbaum, who stepped down last month as the director of the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.


In other words, put more $$$ into the pockets of Bezos and his fellow plutocrats.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
3. Where is government oversight?
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:18 PM
Oct 2014

These pension plans are legal contracts. In a nation that purports to honor 'rule of law' above all else, our courts and agencies are abandoning the workers.

Many plans reduced the reliance on Social Security so as these plans are gutted, more and more fall back on the SS program as a last resort, instead of the retirement they had counted on for their working lives. Talk about rug being pulled out from under you.

Funding the corporate and public sector obligations should have always been a separate endeavor from the sustainability or status of the entity to exactly avoid the opportunity for shenanigans like this.

This keeps happening, where is the political movement to end this?

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
5. My boss is doing that, too.
Sat Oct 11, 2014, 08:27 AM
Oct 2014

And my boss is a "nonprofit." Well, at 72, I don't have much to lose -- my retirement fund is either enough or it is not, at this age -- but my younger co-workers are definitely getting the shaft. Oddly enough, the whistle was blown by the former dean of the Business College.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Washington Post announces...